| Name |
Comments |
| 677) |
|
| viagra |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Perfect!
|
| 676) |
|
| accutane |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Good site,
|
| 675) |
|
| propecia |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hello!
|
| 674) |
|
| adipex |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hi there!
|
| 673) |
|
| adipex |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hello!
|
| 672) |
|
| adipex |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hi there!
|
| 671) |
|
| appetite_suppressants |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hello!
|
| 670) |
|
| vimax_pills |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hello!
|
| 669) |
|
| Natashacup |
|
Street Name, Town: Russia |
|
I want free X-Rumer 7.0.10 ELITE?
Send me URL please!!!
|
| 668) |
|
| Lenenocky |
|
Street Name, Town: Russia |
|
|
| 667) |
|
| Wutzke |
|
Street Name, Town: United States |
|
best forex trader brings the unbiased forex reviews and scam reports by forex traders. Compare brokers, signal services, expert advisors, and other forex products.
|
| 666) |
|
| adipex |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hello!
|
| 665) |
|
| generic_levitra |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Aloha!
|
| 664) |
|
| Gadapee |
|
Street Name, Town: United States |
|
Provides online forex trading with 24 hour customer service, market updates, and news for successful trading forex online.
|
| 663) |
|
| adipex |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Aloha!
|
| 662) |
|
| Pharmf743 |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Very nice site! <a href="http://ypxaieo.com/rrqvxvo/1.html">cheap viagra</a>
|
| 661) |
|
| Pharmd0 |
|
Street Name, Town: USA |
|
Hello! ckkbgda interesting ckkbgda site! I'm really like it! Very, very ckkbgda good!
|
| 660) |
|
| igorokwey |
|
Street Name, Town: Russia |
|
Truth is the door into the New World.
Road to Truth starts here - apwey.net78.net
|
| 659) |
|
| DeegreeEmutty |
|
Street Name, Town: France |
|
Рулетка играть онлайн на деньги, рулетка чат онлайн бесплатно !
|
| 658) |
|
| dissemiClaple |
|
Street Name, Town: Russia |
|
Игры логические онлайн флеш, флеш игры настольный теннис.
|
| 657) |
|
| AccicGedten |
|
Street Name, Town: Switzerland |
|
|
| 656) |
|
| RemoImmeday |
|
Street Name, Town: Guyana |
|
this is a really interesting website. glad to be a part of it! can you check out my website when you get a chance? Debt relief companies
|
| 655) |
|
| Mivedenny |
|
Street Name, Town: Norfolk Island |
|
|
| 654) |
|
| Geraldine Brown |
|
Street Name, Town: Davyhulme Manchester |
|
I am member of the Breathe Clean Air Group, we were there at the meeting at the Civic Centre in Swinton. We are fighting Peel Energy at the moment they want to built an incinerator here at the M60 motorway, I jumped for joy when the councillors said NO to your plant, theses plant should not be built in residental areas to much is at stake health wise. Good Luck to you all.
The Breathe Clean Air Group.
|
| 653) |
|
| Darryll Hall |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Friday, 3. June 2011 12:30
This must be stopped for health reasons but what about the Transfer Station on Lansdowne Road,surely this is a massive problem within our community. Thousands of tonnes of waste rotting away causing odours and infested with rats
|
| 652) |
|
| Delores Daniels |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
The amount of pollution this site will generate is totally unacceptable.
|
| 651) |
|
| Donna Liley |
|
Street Name, Town: Miller Hey Mossley Lancs |
|
 Thursday, 2. June 2011 10:35
I strongly oppose wase incinerators, we are the history recycling with no comparisons, and authorities will live to regret the consequences in years to come.
|
| 650) |
|
| Margaret |
|
Street Name, Town: Montontonfields Road |
|
I strongly oppose this proposal. The added pollution and increase in traffic around the Monton area would be catastrophic to the village.
|
| 649) |
|
| David |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
I suggest that this type of facility would be better located outwith the residential area. Building in this location must create health risks to local residents with the added pollution.
|
| 648) |
|
| Eileen |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
The incinerator plant would be a disaster for the village of Monton. Residents health would be affected with the added pollution and the roads would be congested with the increase in traffic. I strongly oppose this plan.
|
| 647) |
|
| Paul Pheasey |
|
Street Name, Town: Dartford Avenue |
|
I strongly oppose this proposal.
|
| 646) |
|
| Susan Pheasey |
|
Street Name, Town: Dartford Avenue |
|
I would argue that this waste site is NOT going to be beneficial to residents of the surrounding area of Eccles. I am a teacher and fully aware of the health risks that can be caused by breathing in burned waste fumes. You cannot 100% guarantee that our children and will not be breathing in the residue. In addition to this, we do not want a chimney in our sky line. I live in between two such waste burning proposed sites; the other being in Barton. PLEASE listen to the residents' views. There must be many more places that this kind of plant could be placed which would not endanger peoples lives and peoples futures. Think about the next generation and not yourself!
|
| 645) |
|
| Carol |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 1. June 2011 23:44
Please do the right thing - this Eco-dump is not right for Monton. It will have serious environmental, residential and people implications. With the proposed improvements/development along the Bridgewater canal corridor, this type of business in this area does not fit with this strategy.
|
| 644) |
|
| Chris Hill |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Road |
|
 Wednesday, 25. May 2011 11:58
NO TO THE INCINERATOR!
|
| 643) |
|
| V Brumby |
|
Street Name, Town: Half Edge Lane, Eccles |
|
 Wednesday, 18. May 2011 22:36
|
| 642) |
|
| L Brumby |
|
Street Name, Town: Half Edge Lane |
|
 Wednesday, 18. May 2011 22:32
|
| 641) |
|
| j duncan |
|
Street Name, Town: hawthorn ave, monton |
|
The idea of an incinerator so close to a residential area is ill concieved.How can they plan to develop the land by the canal as a tourist area and have an incinerator on the doorstep! There have been some awful decisions that have been made in order to so call improve places/create jobs. Lets hope some people make the right decision for once.
I say an absolute NO to the incinerator.
|
| 640) |
|
| Rachael Wild |
|
Street Name, Town: Beechfield Road |
|
 Tuesday, 17. May 2011 21:15
Cannot believe that this is going to be placed so close to a residential area. Asthma is already on the increase and there is enough pollution in the are. Council are considering turning the canal into a Marina park???? with that burning next door??? Somewhere i would love to spend my recreational time... Not. The roads as far to busy and cannot handle the wear and tear everyday with Pot hole after pot hole. JUST MADNESS
|
| 639) |
|
| Austin Helps |
|
Street Name, Town: Dovedale Avenue |
|
No! No! NO! Europe's largest industrial estate's less than a mile down the road, why no build it there!!!!
|
| 638) |
|
| S Stern-Gillet |
|
Street Name, Town: Highfield Drive, Monton |
|
 Tuesday, 17. May 2011 15:50
Just one word - NO!
|
| 637) |
|
| Jonathan Brumby |
|
Street Name, Town: Half Edge Lane |
|
no to the green lane incinerator.
spend the money on things people want and need.
|
| 636) |
|
| Chris Brumby |
|
Street Name, Town: Half Edge Lane, Eccles |
|
No to Green Lane Eco Dump
|
| 635) |
|
| Nicola McNulty |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
 Tuesday, 17. May 2011 12:52
Why develop a beautiful tourist attraction, spend millions devloping the marina and park land, and then have NO-ONE vist because a massive dirty waste processing plant is less than 200 meters away????
The idea is stupid, the Green Lane 'Eco Park' aka Incinerator can not go ahead, it will distroy the Monton and Wosrley area due to air pollution and the 960 HGV a week travelling along the local roads.
|
| 634) |
|
| Carlo |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley rd, Winton |
|
 Saturday, 14. May 2011 18:05
It dosent make any sense. How can the council think of approving plans for an incinerator.I thought Salford council had approved to a £70 million plan from peel holdings and they wanted to turn the area into a tourist hot spot. What does peel holdings think of Sky properties plans
|
| 633) |
|
| Carla |
|
Street Name, Town: Mather Road, Eccles |
|
No, no, no, we don't want it,don't need it and how can this be happening when the community are so against it? Its all about making money for those in prime position.
|
| 632) |
|
| David McNulty |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
 Friday, 13. May 2011 17:55
This whole situation is appalling right from the beginning. Our MP Hazel Blears did nothing to help the application of this site to be used for housing when she had the chance but now wants to appear "green" by opposing the Green Lane dump. I also object to the nonsense of the project being called an "eco-park", there is nothing eco about burning rubbish next to residential houses. This will undoubtedly wipe a minimum of £15-20k off the value of all houses in the vicinity - are we to be compensated for this? Not to mention the long term impact on our families health. This proposal should never have even got this far – let’s stop it now!
|
| 631) |
|
| Jenny Daniel |
|
Street Name, Town: Rocky Lane, Monton |
|
Who blocked the proposed plans for eco housing and THEN gave the nod to such a disgraceful proposal? Who said Monton would be redeveloped to attract more tourism to the canal side and THEN caved in to the idea of the incinerator? I wonder. What double standards!
|
| 630) |
|
| Teresa Pepper |
|
Street Name, Town: Poynt Chase Worsley |
|
This proposal carries a high level of risk in a largely residential area.I appreciate the need to deal with waste but an alternative site away from humans taking account of the manaagement of teh risks involved would be more appropriate.
|
| 629) |
|
| paula white |
|
Street Name, Town: stafford road |
|
 this is completely outrageous. Surely there is plenty of land to choose from away from the population of this area. NO this should not happen. Find alternative space.
|
| 628) |
|
| Sarah Schofield |
|
Street Name, Town: montonfields road, monton |
|
MASSIVE NO to a unsuitable project in a residential area!
|
| 627) |
|
| Carl |
|
Street Name, Town: richardson rd |
|
 Tuesday, 19. April 2011 09:21
simply NOT wanted thanks get some space on trafford park !!!!!! away from the people ;] cheers!!
|
| 626) |
|
| Samantha |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Green |
|
 Monday, 11. April 2011 23:15
I am against these plans and if they go ahead I for one will sell my house and move away and I am sure many others would too so it isn't going to be good for the area and regeneration of the banks of the bridgewater canal. What tourist will want to see this on their stroll along the stretch between Monton & Patricroft. May I suggest they build houses on the site and knock down the derelict warehousing on the other side of Green Lane and build houses there too. Affordable houses for the people of Eccles would be nice, then they can knock down all the horrible highrise buildings that blight Eccles skyline. Call themselves town planners, what a joke. Why not build this facility next to the Port Salford inductrial development, far far away from a residential area.
|
| 625) |
|
| Rebecca |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Sunday, 10. April 2011 19:33
 This should not go ahead under any circumstances!! The long term risk to eveyones health is obviously not even a consideration of the local council. Maybe if they had got their act together previously as they failed to draw up a local plan for waste disposal in a timely manner hence why we are in this situation!! The council should be ashamed of themselves!!!
|
| 624) |
|
| Christine Crompton |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley |
|
Salford Council propose Monton to be the 'Country in the City' and "the Green Lungs of the City" as per thier Bridgewater Canal Corridor Masterplan Brochure.
The reality of 160 HGV's a day accessing this site and the pollution this additional traffic will generate, let alone any pollution generated by the processes of the 'Eco Park' completely undermines this aspiration.
|
| 623) |
|
| patrick |
|
Street Name, Town: ellesmere green |
|
I am horrified by the proposal to build such a toxic industry so near to a highly populated residential area. I know elderly people with respiratory problems whose health will not be improved by this development. I say NO!!
|
| 622) |
|
| Mason Corbishley |
|
Street Name, Town: Woodhouse Road |
|
Incinerators cause major health problems for everyone especially children. There is sufficient evidence to suggest the links between waste incinerators and health impacts. Object now and please help the Breathe Clean Air Group as well. Visit www.BreatheCleanAirGroup.co.uk
|
| 621) |
|
| Daniel Demarinis |
|
Street Name, Town: 28 Clifton Road |
|
I am completely against this and i find it incredulous that Salford City Council are even considering this proposal with it being in such close proximity to all residential areas in the vacinity. This has to be stopped and a more suitable site sought if the council feel that such a project is needed for the city of Salford.
|
| 620) |
|
| bs |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Thursday, 17. February 2011 21:43
This is a shame on an upcoming area such as Eccles. Why not build a leisure centre, shopping centre, park or residential properties in an upcoming area? Why incinerator? ...This can potentially cause health hazards and biological effects apart from pollution and traffic?
|
| 619) |
|
| K Watts |
|
Street Name, Town: Davyhulme, Manchester |
|
This Should not be allowed in an area where people live.
|
| 618) |
|
| L Wynne |
|
Street Name, Town: Urmston |
|
 Friday, 11. February 2011 21:13
No more pollution!
|
| 617) |
|
| Rob |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea |
|
Any news on this subject?
Are the council going to be bribed as they were with the tesco planning in Walkden?
|
| 616) |
|
| christopher davies |
|
Street Name, Town: victoria road, eccles |
|
The whole idea stinks. To put this huge rubbish disposal and incineration site so close to a settled and thriving residential area is utter madness.When Mr Hirsh made his initial approach any sensible planning officer would have shown him the door. Words fail me when it comes to Salford council and its employees.
|
| 615) |
|
| Jayne Dillon |
|
Street Name, Town: Davyhulme |
|
Keep up the good work. I am a member of the breathe clean air group opposing Peel Energy's incinerator in Davyhulme. I wish you every success.
|
| 614) |
|
| Simon and Natalie |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 2. November 2010 08:17
This will be terrible for the area and we strongly oppose it.
|
| 613) |
|
| Padma Ilango |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
I strongly object the Eco Lane Dump  I would hate it.
|
| 612) |
|
| B ILANGO |
|
Street Name, Town: 16 ELLESMERE ROAD |
|
I strongly oppose the plan as it will have a major impact on traffic and health problems to the residents living in the Ellesmere Park area.
|
| 611) |
|
| Lakenya Benscoter |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
Well, this is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a marvellous job.
|
| 610) |
|
| Sutherden Family |
|
Street Name, Town: 43 Monton Green |
|
Still in disbelief that it's got to this stage. Corporate might swinging it's weight to earn profits any human cost. It literally stinks.
|
| 609) |
|
| Laura Kelly |
|
Street Name, Town: pulford road, sale |
|
|
| 608) |
|
| amanda cordwell |
|
Street Name, Town: kirtley avenue |
|
DONT DO IT........think of the people who live here, not the pollution being dumped here!!!!!!!
|
| 607) |
|
| Steve |
|
Street Name, Town: Cheshire |
|
 Tuesday, 7. September 2010 22:26
Moved out of the area last Christmas before any of this had been publicised. Previous applications for a residential estate had been refused by the council. Therefore, seems hard to understand how this scheme can be given the go ahead.
The roads are at capacity already. More HGVs would make things very difficult for local residents. Good luck with the campaign. I hope the council listen to those they are empowered to represent.
|
| 606) |
|
| Lorraine Jackson |
|
Street Name, Town: 10 skelwith close Urmston |
|
 They are trying to build one at the back of the Trafford centre near to where I live. I fully support you guys. This is terrible
|
| 605) |
|
| danny simpson |
|
Street Name, Town: cromwell road eccles |
|
I strongly appose to this, and i think the traffic on my road and the surrounding areas will be terrible,It is already bad,not to mention the bad impact it would have on communities,health,house prices, and families that have saved for years just to get onto the housing ladder, to see there house plummit.THIS SIMPLY CANNOT HAPPEN!!!!!!!!!!
|
| 604) |
|
| Nicola, Cooper |
|
Street Name, Town: Sutherland st, Winton |
|
 A big fat NO to the incinerator. WHY OH WHY are you putting pollutants in a hightly populated area?!! You expect our families and children to breathe in 80,000 tons of pollution so that u can provide 50 jobs and so called 'save the planet'. Once again i object. Someone must be making alot of money out of this!!!!!
|
| 603) |
|
| Joanna Cebrat |
|
Street Name, Town: Bridgewater Mills |
|
I strongly object to this proposal. Monton is one of the very few 'character districts' in Manchester that I believe will become another Chorlton or Didsbury in the future - BUT only if the plant is not built! The whole Eccles is an 'up and coming area' that currently attracts young professionals and first time buyers that surely will be put off buying around there when the plant is built... and Eccles will never have a chance to become a nice area where people want to live if the Council approves the green lane eco dump plans!
|
| 602) |
|
| Paul Woods |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea Ecckles |
|
Whilst I am aware of the benefits of certain forms of local industry and I am certainly in favour of an 'Eco Park' that can create 'real' jobs for people in our contracting economy, Green Lane is not a suitable location for such a proposal. Having had the opportunity to work a few doors down from a Recycling Plant on Praed Road Trafford Park I can tell you first hand that the amount of mess and noise they create is quite amazing, the damage to our building with trucks driving up and down the access road is quite shocking. Build it at West One Retail Park right next to the impressive Cargil Factory instead of building a Tesco.
|
| 601) |
|
| K Woods |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea, Eccles. |
|
This should not go ahead! Why build one in a residential area? There are plenty of other places in the Manchester area where this could go that aren't so residential! Like Trafford Park or on the way to Irlam. The traffic would be awful if this goes ahead!
|
| 600) |
|
| Louise Arbuckle |
|
Street Name, Town: Knowsley Drive, Swinton |
|
This is an absolutely terrible proposal, to build an incinerator in the residential area of Monton, and it is far too close to the local Park. The risk of pollution and noise to the area is not worth risking local residents health, there must be plenty of other more suitable locations away from houses, it is just unnaceptable. It would have been far more fitting to build something that would benefit the local community and not destroy it!!!
|
| 599) |
|
| John Massey |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 10. August 2010 17:22
I have just purchased a property in the Ellesmere park/Monton area, with the intention of living here. I oppose the plans for reasons relating to pollution and traffic. I don't think such a thing should be allowed in a built up residential area, particularly as I consider it one of the nicest areas in Salford to live.
|
| 598) |
|
| S.Whitehouse |
|
Street Name, Town: Knowsley Drive Swinton |
|
No to the incinerator!
|
| 597) |
|
| D.Whitehouse |
|
Street Name, Town: Knowsley Drive Swinton |
|
Enough pollution and traffic in the area already. No to the incinerator!
|
| 596) |
|
| A Simpson |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
I would like to strongly object to the plans for the Green Lane Incinerator. I am concerned about the increased traffic, increased pollution and overall "feel" of the area. This noisy, busy, polluting industrial unit is far too close to a residential area.
|
| 595) |
|
| Laurence Morris |
|
Street Name, Town: Knowsley Drive, Salford |
|
The Incinerator plant will destroy the `village` atmosphere and cause too much pollution with the additional traffic.
|
| 594) |
|
| Eveline Morris |
|
Street Name, Town: Knowsley Drive, Swinton Salfor |
|
There would be too much traffic, it would also spoil the area around the canal.
|
| 593) |
|
| M.O'Toole |
|
Street Name, Town: Hardy St Peeel Green |
|
 Tuesday, 10. August 2010 10:57
This is a big no no Eccles Town is bad enough without this belonging to it its about time the Council started thinking about the people who live here and not the councils pocket.
|
| 592) |
|
| Franny |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Road, Winton |
|
 Monday, 9. August 2010 23:31
 Salford Council would be making a huge mistake, Say no to the incinerator
|
| 591) |
|
| Carlo |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley road, Winton |
|
 Monday, 9. August 2010 23:30
 How could people even imagine/ let alone draw up plans for such a thing to be built in this area. The council would be making a huge mistake to accept planning permission
|
| 590) |
|
| Digger Dave |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
I know the site is designated for business / industrial usage within the the UDP, but feel really angry and frustrated that we are in this position due to successful challenge of previous applications for a residential development. As a consequence we have inadvertently put ourselves in a very difficult position. Taking this into consideration, how can the council uphold a challenge to this development? It hindsight it would have been far better for all to go for housing - a missed opportunity i feel.
|
| 589) |
|
| Richard Hoddes |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Although I have little problem with the proposed use of the site, I do not think the roads in the area are capable of withstanding the increased traffic. Unless a direct spur is taken from the motorway, I wholly oppose this project.
|
| 588) |
|
| J Lawrence |
|
Street Name, Town: Park Road, Monton |
|
 Sunday, 8. August 2010 14:49
I would like to state I am against the plans for the Green Lane Incinarator. I am concerned about the increased traffic, increadsed pollution and overall "feel" of the area. This noisy, busy, polluting industrial unit is far to close to a residential area.
|
| 587) |
|
| Carol Wakefield |
|
Street Name, Town: Poplar Road, Monton |
|
We say No to the green Lane Incinerator. It is absolute madness to build this Incinerator in the residential area of Monton. It is going to be located very close to the only Play Park in Monton. The noise, smell and pollution from Traffic will be unnaceptable. Why not build a supermarket or Leisure facility here. Something that is going to be of use to the community living near it.
|
| 586) |
|
| Paul Short |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Road, Monton |
|
I oppose the the incinerator.
|
| 585) |
|
| Terry |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea |
|
 Sunday, 8. August 2010 13:56
The amount of traffic and fumes fron the plant will turn this into a no go area
|
| 584) |
|
| Amanda Cahill |
|
Street Name, Town: Hawthorn Ave, Monton. |
|
 Sunday, 8. August 2010 13:40
A definite no. I strongly oppose the Green Lane incinerator project. Shame upon Sky Properties for trying to pollute and run down the local area. We attended The Monton Hotel conference and it was plain to see the over whelming anger at this immoral proposal. Where is your integrity Sky Properties?
If this goes ahead we will sell up at a loss and move to where the council respects its local people.
|
| 583) |
|
| Darren Malone |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton, Eccles. |
|
I cannot express enough how much I am against this issue. I definitely oppose the green lane incinerator. I cannot believe that this proposal has been allowed to get this far and it concerns me greatly. If it went ahead I would never forgive Salford City Council. Monton has been greatly neglected, just take a look at the pavements,roads and cut down tree's. We want a facelift, not poisoning. Enough is enough.
|
| 582) |
|
| M Pickup |
|
Street Name, Town: Green lane |
|
say no to green lane Incinerator !!!!
|
| 581) |
|
| Angela |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Sunday, 8. August 2010 00:27
just say NO!!! Its easy really!
|
| 580) |
|
| hugh mcguire |
|
Street Name, Town: woodgarth lane worsley |
|
 Saturday, 7. August 2010 16:57
This develoment will cause distress and ill heath to many. I forsee many claims being made for compensation due to the settlement of fumes/smoke in this area carries on the prevailing winds.
|
| 579) |
|
| thorley |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 utting this incinerator so near homes, schools anda place where people go for walkes to feel the fresh air i thought the council were trying to promote healthy living for the people of salford we will wait and see if this is the case
|
| 578) |
|
| Bertrand Stern-Gillet |
|
Street Name, Town: Highfield Drive, Monton |
|
Say no to the incinerator - Manchester's Chernobyl!
|
| 577) |
|
| S.Lesley Wrightson |
|
Street Name, Town: Moorside Road, Swinton |
|
The prevailing winds - south westerly - would blow exhaust from the chimney across a large residential area - a potential risk to health from pollutants, dust and odours. The high volume of HGV traffic entering and exiting the proposed site will greatly increase the traffic problems to pedestrians, road users and businesses in Monton and the areas through which the HGVs would have to travel - Folly Lane/Worsley Road/A580 junctions; Worsley Roundabout, etc. The proposal is inappropriate so close to this pleasant, largely residential area which has been likened to the pleasant areas of Chorlton. Why degrade the area and in the process increase health risks & cause traffic chaos in the areas through which the HGVs would have to pass?
|
| 576) |
|
| Anna Ellam |
|
Street Name, Town: Rocky Lane, Monton |
|
the number of vehicle movements proposed by this development is ridiculous and totally wrong for a residential area- as is the type of development. The land should have been be re-designated a long time ago as the area is no longer suitable for commercial use.
|
| 575) |
|
| Simon Ellam |
|
Street Name, Town: 86 Rocky Lane |
|
Too much trafiic for an insufficient infrastructure and too close to the local community. This land was once an industrial estate - when the canal was used but is no longer practical for industrial use never mind for this!
|
| 574) |
|
| Caroline Fox |
|
Street Name, Town: Crawford Street, Monton |
|
 Friday, 6. August 2010 10:04
I strongly object to the proposals due to:
- The major detrimental impact of the additional HGVs on the local roads.
- The noise, dust, litter, smells and pollution that would be blown towards the pleasant residential area of Monton, which houses many families, nurseries and schools. There is a risk of causing health hazards for young children and adults alike.
- The visual imact of the chimney.
Much effort has gone into making Monton a thriving and attractive ‘village’. It would be reckless to damage this by approving the proposals.
|
| 573) |
|
| lucia |
|
Street Name, Town: monton, eccles |
|
No, no, no, this is a no I am totally against this ridiculous idea. I shall be emailing councillors and my mp. This is already a congested area for traffic, let along all the other problems it will create. Say no now.
|
| 572) |
|
| carol |
|
Street Name, Town: eccles, manchester |
|
 I do not want this here, nor do my family. This is unthinkable to do this. Please stop this happening. Residents unite to stop this. The council should oppose it. Try putting it in Wilmslow or Alderley Edge, no I thought not because the people there wouldn't have it, so why should the people of Eccles?
|
| 571) |
|
| Eddie |
|
Street Name, Town: Thorn road , manchester |
|
 I really am opposed to this plan and development. This will ruin the area and everyone will suffer. If the planning committee allow this, then there is no justice.
|
| 570) |
|
| victor |
|
Street Name, Town: mather road, eccles |
|
This is awful. Why the residents don't have a say needs to be asked. This will be the downfall of the area, houses will be hard to sell, prices will drop and the smell, noise and traffic inconvenience will have a real impact. So many vehicles thundering down the already congested route. It is a dangerous road to have this, have traffic management / planning lost their minds to think this will work? Let alone the height of part of it. Act now and say no, or live to regret it.
|
| 569) |
|
| carla |
|
Street Name, Town: Mather Road, Eccles |
|
|
| 568) |
|
| michael ashton |
|
Street Name, Town: mitchell st monton |
|
definately opposed to proposal don't want lorries, don't want the chimney, don't want any of it
|
| 567) |
|
| joyce keogh |
|
Street Name, Town: jubilee close monton |
|
I am definitely opposed to the proposal, we don't want it
|
| 566) |
|
| Paul Mckenzie |
|
Street Name, Town: Ashridge Dr Eccles |
|
Use the area for something worth while. These kind of things should be built in the middle of nowhere if they have to be built at all!!!
|
| 565) |
|
| Mr Horrigan |
|
Street Name, Town: Trevor Road, Winton |
|
 Thursday, 5. August 2010 18:02
I object to the proposed Eco Park on Green Lane.
160 Bin wagon movements per day!!!!
This development should be on one of the many vacant sites within Trafford Park where there are no resedential areas.
|
| 564) |
|
| Dave |
|
Street Name, Town: Green Lane |
|
 Wednesday, 4. August 2010 18:36
I am against this development as it means more noise...more traffic...more pollution...and it will be an eysore at over 150ft high...keep Monton/Eccles clean and fresh.........
|
| 563) |
|
| Lesley Britton |
|
Street Name, Town: Park Road, Walkden |
|
In an already congested suburban area this "bulid" would have a massive impact ... increased volume in traffic and an adverse effect on the environment on so many levels; pollution, the buring of carbon fuel (transportation), the noise and the effects on the local wildlife.
|
| 562) |
|
| P McFarland |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
 Tuesday, 3. August 2010 21:36
i'm definitely against this proposal for all the disruption and problems it would cause for local residents
|
| 561) |
|
| Lisa Howard |
|
Street Name, Town: Shackleton street |
|
Major concerns over damage to health and environment
|
| 560) |
|
| Richard |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Tuesday, 3. August 2010 20:44
This will ruin Monton and should not even be a consideration by the council.
|
| 559) |
|
| stephen raynor |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 3. August 2010 20:31
this should be in trafford park
|
| 558) |
|
| clare raynor |
|
Street Name, Town: monton road |
|
monton would not cope with the traffic........i think it is a very bad idea!!!!!!
|
| 557) |
|
| Christine Prescott |
|
Street Name, Town: Leconfield Road, Winton |
|
I object to this development for the following points.
close proximity to residential and businesses.
Visual impact
Impact on the Highways network on already congested local roads.
|
| 556) |
|
| Rina Bharath |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
 Sunday, 1. August 2010 14:25
I like living in Monton as it is - we're not happy about a disgusting incinerator being added to the lovely greenery!
|
| 555) |
|
| Anil Bharath |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
 Sunday, 1. August 2010 14:21
The incinerator must be stopped!
|
| 554) |
|
| Denis McCulloch |
|
Street Name, Town: Cavendish Road |
|
I oppose the planning of Green Lane Eco Park.
|
| 553) |
|
| Alice Chiu |
|
Street Name, Town: Egerton Road, Monton |
|
I object to the development of Green lane incinerator plant Ref: 10/59093/OUTEIA and 10/590092/FULEIA. I have read the proposal and I do not think that emmision of NO in residential area is acceptable. This is clearly going to affect the air quality around Monton. This is also going to affect local traffic significantly. Having a Chimney stack of 55 metres will affect the Lanscape of Monton.
|
| 552) |
|
| Dr Yee Chiu |
|
Street Name, Town: Egerton road, Monton |
|
I object to the greenlane eco Park development. ref: 10/59093/outeia and 10/590092/fuleia
|
| 551) |
|
| P Collins |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
I oppose this. Not the location for this development. There are many more suitable locations on brownfield sites nearby in places such as Trafford Park. Places where the building will not be in the immediate vicinity of schools, residential property and green spaces where children play.
|
| 550) |
|
| Mr E Cathcart |
|
Street Name, Town: Asbury Court, Mitchell Street, |
|
I object to this proposal because it will cause air pollution, congestion, and is too near a residential area. The amount of HGVs proposed will also cause even further damage to the already pot-holed roads.
|
| 549) |
|
| Frank S |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Friday, 30. July 2010 16:41
I object to this proposal because it will cause air pollution, congestion, and is too near a residential area. The amount of HGVs proposed will also cause even further damage to the already pot-holed roads.
|
| 548) |
|
| Diane S |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Friday, 30. July 2010 16:33
I totally oppose this proposal and have already sent my objection to the Council
|
| 547) |
|
| GARY OWEN |
|
Street Name, Town: LIVERPOOL RD, PEEL GREEN |
|
I AM MORE THAN HAPPY TO OPPOSE THIS PLANNING APPLICATION
|
| 546) |
|
| R Dickson |
|
Street Name, Town: Tindall Street, Peel Green |
|
 Friday, 30. July 2010 10:19
No, no, no.
I am totally against this 'development'.
More traffic, more noise and more smells.
This, combined with the smells we have to put up with from the sewage plant close to the Chill Factore is too much for Salford residents.
|
| 545) |
|
| Iza Lowe |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Thursday, 29. July 2010 22:42
Say no to the eco dump
|
| 544) |
|
| Mrs S Watson |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea, Swans Reach, Eccles |
|
This is a residential area long gone are the 50's & 60's, industial use is no longer warranted in this area.
I understand that processing will continue 24 hours a day, do the local council not think we have enough noise pollution to put up with, what with the motorway and all. Green Lane is a traffic rat run already, with additionial Pelican crossings been installed to reduce accidents. HGV's every 7.5 minutes will only exacerbate the problem.
Salford has a population of residents already suffering with respiratory problems, I am totally against this proposal!!! Call me a Nimby but I value my health thank you!!!
|
| 543) |
|
| Glyn Williams |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Rd |
|
When they propose something which improves the air quality and reduces the amount of traffic and noise, I'll help build it for free.
This development could be built at Trafford Park, or several other places further from residential areas but just as close to transport links.
I wholeheartedly object to the proposals.
|
| 542) |
|
| Tim Sheldon |
|
Street Name, Town: Crawford street, Monton |
|
I strongly oppose the building of this incinerator,
If the people who want to build this incinerator would consent to building one in their village/ town/ neighbourhood first? If not why do they insist on building one near mine?
I have just had a baby and I want my child to grow up away from the smell of rotting compost, the rats it will most surely bring, and the 10m tower of waist paper blowing all over the Monton, not to mention the health risks such as asthma due to the dust and pollution in the air.
I also like to hang the washing out in the garden to dry, would the people who want to build this like to go to work in shirts and trousers that have been dried in an atmosphere of dust and pollution that probably smell worst after they have been dried outside, as a driving instructor my job requires me to be in a close proximity to another person, for various lengths of time, it is bad enough have a hot day when people sweat, what would they think if they got into a car everyday that smelt of a tip? I for one would change my instructor if I were learning in a car like that.
|
| 541) |
|
| D Skrytek |
|
Street Name, Town: Derby |
|
 The Isle of Wight ENERGOS incinerator has breached dioxin limits and is shut down. Why did the UK sign the Persistent Organic POllutants Treaty to reduce the creation of dioxin?
|
| 540) |
|
| Malcolm Smith |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Village |
|
I oppose this plan
|
| 539) |
|
| Anthony Ratcliffe |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Eccles |
|
Anyone remember Bhopal?
|
| 538) |
|
| Laura Bimpson |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
We can't let this happen!
|
| 537) |
|
| tony leach |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens |
|
 I cannot believe this is even being considered, I bet there are no one at the planning office living in monton. Traffic chaos, polution, noise, property prices destroyed.
|
| 536) |
|
| Lorraine Shaw |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens Monton |
|
Just another example of how corporations have little regard for people and communities!
|
| 535) |
|
| Jessica Churchward |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
 Wednesday, 28. July 2010 12:58
How sad this threat has been made to the area. The compromises it is prepared to make are awful. Unhealthy and detrimental on so many levels. Not to mention there is already more traffic in this area than it's capacity can take.
I imagine the site is cheaper than others. And will make someone a lot of money. It's an absolute shame the extent people are prepared to go to.
|
| 534) |
|
| Matthew Henderson |
|
Street Name, Town: Cavendish Road, Monton |
|
I strongly object to the incinerator for a number of reasons including noxious fumes and smells, environmental concerns, traffic and noise concerns and the detrimental impact it will have on the communities of Monton and Eccles
|
| 533) |
|
| Paul |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
I am againist the incinerator!
|
| 532) |
|
| Carl O'Malley |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane, Winton |
|
I strongly object to this application on both environmental and traffic grounds.
fxZcAMEaYnHbPWx:
Yup, that'll do it. You have my aprpiceation.
|
MKPYkKLSG:
Hey, that post leaves me feelnig foolish. Kudos to you!
|
|
| 531) |
|
| Susan Catlow |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane, Winton |
|
I strongly object to this application on the grounds that the environmental impact can never be fully known until it's too late and on the basis that the increased levels of traffic, both on Green Lane and surrounding roads like Parrin Lane, will be unacceptable; I already have cracks in my living room walls from the number of HGVs that already travel down Parrin Lane - I would prefer it if my house didn't end up crumbling due to the additional 1 HGV every 6 minutes proposed by this 'Eco Park'.
|
| 530) |
|
| Janette |
|
Street Name, Town: M32 9TA |
|
I object strongly to this development on many different grounds. It is totally environmentally friendly and facts and figures are not backed up - this is a sure sign of some kind of deception.
|
| 529) |
|
| L Yeates |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 27. July 2010 19:52
I Object to the incinerator!!!!!
|
| 528) |
|
| Gavin Royle |
|
Street Name, Town: Darwell Avenue, Eccles M30 |
|
no way to this proposal.
|
| 527) |
|
| Asim Mumtaz |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane |
|
|
| 526) |
|
| Thomas Stuart |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
One of the councils worst ideas, don't ruin monton. No-one in the local area wants this!
|
| 525) |
|
| Barrie James |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Sunday, 25. July 2010 21:49
How can this happen ?
|
| 524) |
|
| Jimi |
|
Street Name, Town: MONTON |
|
 Sunday, 25. July 2010 16:25
Are they mad or just desperate? This toxin spewing lorry mahem making nonsense must be stopped. recycling -YES on Green lane -NO
|
| 523) |
|
| Eve Grimshaw |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green, Monton |
|
 Saturday, 24. July 2010 14:03
Would much prefer a leisure centre.
Definitely against the incinerator
|
| 522) |
|
| New resident |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere green |
|
No NO NO this is ridiculous idea,we need a park with a skate park or village houses, not a dirty smelly tip disguised by trees and a ha ha visitor centre who wants to go and spend a day out at the tip. The poor residents on green lane must not be able to rest in their beds at night just thinking about this and if it goes ahead they will nver slepp due to the noise, smell and HGV traffic. So if the HGVs can't get stuck under the bridge are they going to go through the village no way this has to be stopped. Salford council your were wrong to turn down sky properties planning offer of eco homes. SALFORD COUNCIL SUPPORT YOUR RESIDENTS FOR A CHANGE NOT MONEY MAKING IDEAS THAT WRECK THE COMMUNITY AND PEOPLES LIVES.
WAOlRMsy:
Cheers pal. I do appreciate the wrinitg.
|
|
| 521) |
|
| David Staniland |
|
Street Name, Town: 29 Cavendish Road, Eccles |
|
I have several concerns about this development, namely, the smell, noise and increase of traffic around the site.
As a local resident, the smell and traffic congestion created by extra HGV vehicle movement will affect my everyday living dramatically.
Even at off-peak hours, the traffic through Monton and on Liverpool Road can be heavy, I dread to think what it will be like when 185 daily roundtrips are undertaken by these HGVs. There is NO way of overcoming this issue.
The developer/agent claims materials will be used to reduce the smells emitted. Who are they kidding? The site is going to emit masses of pollution, it's going to stink. I live in Monton where, I am informed, the wind will cause the smell to drift towards.
The developer argues that vehicle noise from the motorway will drown out the noise of the machinery. But the plant machines will run 24 hours a day. What about the noise in the evenings and at night, when there are no cars on the motorway?
The land is designated in the UDP as employment land, which does restrict it's potential, but I believe there are several other options which should be considered before this application for an incinerator is ever be approved.
HGNEdGdhNjPdwfYIe:
Wonderful explnataoin of facts available here.
|
VzlzEukCwY:
And I was just wonrdeing about that too!
|
|
| 520) |
|
| alan chambers |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 Friday, 23. July 2010 14:20
this is a disgrace! are they going to turn monton green into a three lane double rounabout with traffic lights and yellow boxes and 36 signposts per square metre? if you want to go for a wander round the woods it will take an extra 15 minutes to cross the road! I don't want a waste processing plant so close to a residential area thanks; there's plenty of empty land a few miles west, give us low density housing, a skate park and some open public space please! I'd rather have another 50 nail salons than this dump, it could be the rusholme of the manicure world!
|
| 519) |
|
| loretta fox |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 Wednesday, 21. July 2010 21:39
this must not happen!!!!!!!!!!!
|
| 518) |
|
| Daryl |
|
Street Name, Town: Peel Green Road |
|
|
| 517) |
|
| Emily Murray |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 8. June 2010 12:28
|
| 516) |
|
| julian goodman |
|
Street Name, Town: bradford road. Monton |
|
If anyone wants to see what a waste transfer plant can do to the local environment then visit Redgate Lane, Off Hyde Road, M12. The road is filthy, it smells foul and there is litter and debris all around. The road is regularly closed to allow for the sweeping up of mud from the lorry tyres, how convenient would it be to close Green Lane?
|
| 515) |
|
| Rena Gough |
|
Street Name, Town: Highfield Drive, Monton |
|
 Sunday, 30. May 2010 12:08
It is neither needed nor wanted by the local community, there is plenty of other land for sale around Manchester away from residential areas.
|
| 514) |
|
| terri lock |
|
Street Name, Town: warren drive |
|
|
| 513) |
|
| E Logan |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane |
|
Not on our doorstep! Find somewhere else!
|
| 512) |
|
| stephen anchor |
|
Street Name, Town: marsden st. monton. |
|
a serious threat to the health of local people.
|
| 511) |
|
| Mr Stewart |
|
Street Name, Town: Worlsey |
|
 Thursday, 6. May 2010 15:02
This is an outrage, it must be stopped!
|
| 510) |
|
| Laura Doyle |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
I am strongly opposed to this proposal which will negatively impact so many aspects of not only village life but also the surrounding areas.
|
| 509) |
|
| Matt Doyle |
|
Street Name, Town: Algernon Street, Monton |
|
 Thursday, 22. April 2010 15:47
I strongly oppose the incinerator.
The incinerator will have a negative impact on the environment, house prices & the quality of life for residents of Monton, Patricroft & surrounding areas.
|
| 508) |
|
| Hazel Marchant |
|
Street Name, Town: folly lane |
|
Monton & is businesses are currently thriving and this would destroy the village. I hope that salford council will rethink and allow planning for residential housing. This will bring more money into the community and local businesses. This proposed usage should not be sited close to any residential area, not just monton. Please inform me of any meetings.
|
| 507) |
|
| Shelly Robinson |
|
Street Name, Town: Westwood Crescent |
|
I feel very strongly that this incinerator will only cause harm to all of the local residents, due to all the points listed on the petition. It should be put as far away from residential properties as possible. Please, please listen to this petition.
|
| 506) |
|
| Lisa Lewtas |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley |
|
I can not believe that this site is being proposed as suitable so close to schools and a prime residential area - completely unsuitable in my opinion.
|
| 505) |
|
| Pat Haworth |
|
Street Name, Town: Stafford Road, Monton, |
|
We have lived here for 38 years and over the years we have had lots of smells from Trafford Park. These have decreased in the last decade where we can now go into the garden in the summer without having a nasty smell.
ROTTING RUBBISH DOES NOT BELONG WHERE PEOPLE LIVE. GREEN LANE IS IN THE MIDDLE OF COMMUNITY. WHAT ARE YOU THINKING ABOUT?
|
| 504) |
|
| A. Eldi |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park, Eccles |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 16:16
Absolute madness!!! An industrial incinerator unit within a residential area serviced daily by 100s of HGV's with disastrous consequences in terms of increased pollution, traffic congestion and health risks to local residents. It is very surprising that Salford Council are even considering this proposal especially after refusing planning for building houses on this site. Far better developing this area for the interest and wellbeing of the local community (children's playground, houses, etc). Isn't this what our elected representatives are supposed to do? Or is this just a naive assumption...
|
| 503) |
|
| Jane Rodders |
|
Street Name, Town: gilda crescent road, eccles |
|
This suggested development is unacceptable for a residential area.
|
| 502) |
|
| Kathryn Rees |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
It is not a good idea and shouldn't be considered within a residential area.
|
| 501) |
|
| S Griffin |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Theres plenty of land in Trafford park where the waste is comming from, keep it their.
|
| 500) |
|
| Alan |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
 Thursday, 7. January 2010 19:51
We already have more than enough rubbish and traffic in this area. Someone, Somewhere, should care.
|
| 499) |
|
| Alison Anderson |
|
Street Name, Town: Perth |
|
Perth has been fighting a similar application. Incinerators should not be built in areas close to where people live.
|
| 498) |
|
| Lucy Bean |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Sunday, 18. April 2010 19:38
Don't do this, don't destroy yet another place & disrupt peoples lives!! Leave it as it is. Its wrong.
|
| 497) |
|
| Cara Anderson |
|
Street Name, Town: Sutherland St, Winton |
|
 Friday, 16. April 2010 14:20
I am disgusted by the plans, they will destroy a lovely area. There are so many better uses for the site (such as using it to help Salford's anticipated housing shortage.) It makes me very angry that there has not been a lot of information about such damaging plans. Salford Council can not let this go ahead!
|
| 496) |
|
| lesley jones |
|
Street Name, Town: swansea |
|
 Thursday, 15. April 2010 06:05
dont ruin another area by building it!!
|
| 495) |
|
| Jill Wigmore-Welsh |
|
Street Name, Town: Berkshire |
|
Goodness please keep the open spaces junk free for God's sake !!!!!!
|
| 494) |
|
| The Wright Family |
|
Street Name, Town: Hatton AVe, Eugene, OR |
|
Are you kidding me. Don't even think about building it!
|
| 493) |
|
| sharon schofield |
|
Street Name, Town: withington |
|
don't build it
|
| 492) |
|
| j mayer |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Wednesday, 14. April 2010 12:59
 no to the development
|
| 491) |
|
| helen stanmore |
|
Street Name, Town: 205 cavendish street ipswich |
|
do not spoil the country side with this
|
| 490) |
|
| Joanna Kelly |
|
Street Name, Town: Cromwell Road, Eccles |
|
We may be close to the motorway network but Green Lane was not designed for heavy dumper trucks and lorries - as evidenced by the number of trucks that get stuck under/have to turn back at the railway bridge. This area of Patricroft is already scruffy and becoming run down with old housing stock and falling down industrial buildings. We need help to smarten up the area, not send it spiralling into decline by the addition of a disgusting eco dump. People in Patricroft are proud of their area - personally I would prefer to see the industrial park next door to this site expanded, providing more affordable warehousing and manufacturing space for small and medium sized enterprises. Or better still a change of use and some attractive 3 and 4 bed houses built.
|
| 489) |
|
| Veronica Hamer |
|
Street Name, Town: Douglas Road, Worsley |
|
 Tuesday, 13. April 2010 22:32
Heavy Polution, heavy traffic on access roads which are not designed to take such traffic. Fringing on a residential area maintained with great pride and hard work by the local residents!
|
| 488) |
|
| A.W. Hamer |
|
Street Name, Town: Douglas Road, Worsley. |
|
 Tuesday, 13. April 2010 22:08
Pollution and massive traffic build up on roads not designed for such intensive use.
|
| 487) |
|
| Dave Speers |
|
Street Name, Town: Manchester |
|
 keep off the grass
|
| 486) |
|
| Pam Ward |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road, Monton |
|
Just say NO!
|
| 485) |
|
| Denise |
|
Street Name, Town: montonields |
|
 Sunday, 4. April 2010 16:39
Lets never be forced into protesting against stupid proposls such as this again,"The elections are drawing near"
|
| 484) |
|
| Ian & Paula Gibson |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
This proposal is so far off kilter it is rediculous and should be scrubbed from the drawing board altogether. Perhaps all these people who want to make money by upsetting and ruining a community and an up and coming village by allowing some jokers to build anti-social and anti-people eyesores in a heavily populated place. Please tell everyone you know and lets get these ideas properly squashed!!
|
| 483) |
|
| Paula Gibson |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Road |
|
As a business on Monton Rd, I can on foresee a ghost town if this proposal is passed...so a BIG NO from me!
|
| 482) |
|
| Adrian Wilson |
|
Street Name, Town: Marsden Street, Monton Village |
|
 Saturday, 3. April 2010 13:22
With all the empty land between Eccles & the M6 Junction 21, why is this being built so close to a residential area?
|
| 481) |
|
| anne horan |
|
Street Name, Town: walker road/ eccles |
|
Say no to polution !!!!!
|
| 480) |
|
| Mr M Hancock |
|
Street Name, Town: Russell Street, Eccles |
|
 Saturday, 3. April 2010 12:48
 Stay away from Green Lane...I SAY NO !!!!!
|
| 479) |
|
| Mrs R Hancock |
|
Street Name, Town: Russell Street, Eccles |
|
 Saturday, 3. April 2010 12:47
 I definately DO NOT want it on Green Lane at all..... I SAY NO !!!!!
|
| 478) |
|
| Tim Seabrook |
|
Street Name, Town: Napier Road, Monton |
|
Money shouldn't be being wasted like this on an incinerator. D-T Fusion plants are the future of clean technology, fund those! Not this pockmark on the community.
|
| 477) |
|
| hoon |
|
Street Name, Town: St George's Crescent |
|
Incinerators are oppsed by enviromental groups all over the country. Check out Friends of the Earth's new Waste campaign. It's been shown that incinerators tonne for tonne create more CO2 emissions then ehergy, not to mention the other hazardous wastes of course. Plus it conveniently detracts the council from doing what it really should be doing: reduce, re-use and recycle
|
| 476) |
|
| emma |
|
Street Name, Town: eccles |
|
Trafford park, the chemical plant, the motorways, now an incinerator. Eccles is already polluted and now to be used as a dumping ground at our expense.
|
| 475) |
|
| Dave Atherton |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
 Wednesday, 17. March 2010 13:54
160 more lorries a day on already congested roads! whoever suggested this obviously doesn't live in the area so doesn't care.
|
| 474) |
|
| Sara |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 15. March 2010 20:03
Has to be a better way to dispose of rubbish.
|
| 473) |
|
| Julie Gosney |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road, Monton |
|
No thanks, Do not want this to spoil a great place to live.
|
| 472) |
|
| Colin Talbot |
|
Street Name, Town: Bradgreen road, Monton |
|
The scheme must not be allowed to go ahead.
It is an outrageous scheme.
|
| 471) |
|
| Richard & Helen Ellis |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green, Monton |
|
Can not imagine any one in Monton wanting this sort of development especially so close to the local park
|
| 470) |
|
| Jon&Kerry |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill |
|
 Monday, 8. March 2010 14:16
Totally unsuitable/madness! This is contrary to the council's Bridgewater Canal Corridor Draft Masterplan, which states: - 1. Monton: 'country in the city'. An opportunity exists in Monton to create and develop a 'green' lung in the city offering a recreational and leisure resource for all sections of the community. 2. Patricroft: 'waterside regeneration'. Proposals for this area focus on the development of a mixed-use neigbourhood, incorporating family housing and apartments alongside employment uses. So. attracting retail and leisure employment (local cafes, pubs, restaurants) to service local residents and visitors to the canal.
|
| 469) |
|
| Val & John |
|
Street Name, Town: Garner Drive, Monton |
|
A disgraceful proposition to be considered in such a residential area!!!
|
| 468) |
|
| A Casserley |
|
Street Name, Town: Sheringham Drive |
|
 Is there not already enough pollution in the area from the motorway -why on earth do they want to make it even worse !
|
| 467) |
|
| jaydee |
|
Street Name, Town: winton |
|
 Wednesday, 3. March 2010 18:35
and the council are wanting our vote.....they must be joking, they must get their blinkers off and not even consider to say yes
|
| 466) |
|
| Samantha Green |
|
Street Name, Town: Lulworth Road |
|
Salford Council yet again letting the people of Eccles down by using our town as a dumping ground.
|
| 465) |
|
| winton resident |
|
Street Name, Town: winton |
|
how on earth has this mad idea even been contemplated.
|
| 464) |
|
| Kelly Woodman |
|
Street Name, Town: Parkstone Lane, Worsley |
|
 Monday, 1. March 2010 18:17
This is an absolute disgrace to even think about having a waste site in a residential area. This can not happen!!!
|
| 463) |
|
| Ian James |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
This cannot happen! Please spread the word and get other people to sign this petition.
|
| 462) |
|
| Mas Hussain |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
Salford City council doing what suits them best and not the people. A bunch self serving idiots who cannot see past their own agenda. They mananged to ruin Eccles over the years now they are filtering outwards as there is nothing left to decimate in that area. Grow some and start to listen to the people and not the lobbyists. This area should be designated housing or at least something that contributes to the area.
|
| 461) |
|
| lesley chandler |
|
Street Name, Town: monton green |
|
 Thursday, 25. February 2010 23:12
no no no no!
|
| 460) |
|
| Joshua Forster |
|
Street Name, Town: Alba Close, Eccles, Manchester |
|
I think is a terrible idea, It should be made into something which will benefit, for example a sports facility for the community i say NO to this.
|
| 459) |
|
| Fr David Sutton |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
 Wednesday, 24. February 2010 20:46
There is already a considerable traffic problem in the Monton/Winton area, which seemed to increase with the building of the industrial units on the old ROF site some years ago, and no doubt partly due to the inaccessibilty of route through the railway bridge at Patricroft. The last thing we need is more lorries. Local roads are not suitable for increased weight and numbers.
|
| 458) |
|
| Mr. D. Lyons |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane Resident |
|
 Tuesday, 23. February 2010 00:50
WARNING - Road Network Nightmare ahead !
We already endure heavy traffic along Parrin Lane as HGV's use this road to get to the Industrial Park on Green Lane due to the low bridge if they approach from Liverpool Road end !
The traffic along Parrin Lane greatly increased after the building of the Trafford Centre
Throw in the exhaust pollution from the nearby M602 and the proposed Incinerator plant traffic and the residents will need gas masks to breathe !
The air quality will be worse than a chinese coal fired power plant
Asthma levels will increase, smog, soot deposits etc will force folk indoors
For common sense sake - Vote NO
|
| 457) |
|
| Mr. J. Clifford |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
Raikes Lane Incerator off the A666 at Bolton, daily churns out volumes of smoke from its chimney, the lane itself is choked with heavy lorries also emitting dangerous & toxic fumes
If you need more convincing before you vote NO, may I respectfully suggest you pay the Bolton site a visit !
Voting No is the ONLY sensible option
|
| 456) |
|
| A MONTON RESIDENT |
|
Street Name, Town: EGERTON RD |
|
 Monday, 22. February 2010 21:41
NO WAY can this be allowed to happen. I AM APPALLED. Build something for the local residents to enjoy on the site, don't scare them away. Horrible news. I am willing to fight this.
|
| 455) |
|
| Simon Martin |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Road,Winton |
|
 Monday, 22. February 2010 19:35
Surely this site should be used for the many more homes Salford council say we need. It should not be used for industry it is a residential area.
|
| 454) |
|
| Keith |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Road, Winton |
|
If residents living further away from the proposed site think that it won't affect them, then think again. Polution from plant and traffic will not confine itself to Green lane. If the idea was so good then why not build a plant at the Council waste disposal site were they an get all the waste they want delivered to their door with no extra transortation costs other than the waste wagons that already collect door to door.
|
| 453) |
|
| Julia Brown |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Road, Winton |
|
 Monday, 22. February 2010 19:31
Stupid idea that will destroy the community of Monton
|
| 452) |
|
| Helen |
|
Street Name, Town: worsley |
|
Industrial processes should be sited in industrial zones,simple! Is there no space on trafford park for this,where has common sense gone?
|
| 451) |
|
| Daniel McAvoy |
|
Street Name, Town: Snowdon Road, Eccles |
|
Does not make sense building it here? There is lots of brownfield land that it could be built outside of the city?
|
| 450) |
|
| Alex Elliott |
|
Street Name, Town: longford rd west |
|
Nobody should have to put up with this especially near a busy built up area with schools and residential property!
|
| 449) |
|
| elizabeth yeates |
|
Street Name, Town: egerton monton |
|
Absolutely not!
We will lie down in front of the bull dozers!
|
| 448) |
|
| Tina Wilding |
|
Street Name, Town: montonfields Road, Monton, MCR |
|
I have grave concerns regarding this recycling and incinerator plant being built in an already busy but NICE area. This could changed Monton for the worse in a very short space of time as we will be unable to sell our house or the value of our houses being reduced by around 40% (if this goes the same way as Nottingham!!) and then being unable to afford to live elsewhere! The roads in and out of monton are already busy during certain times of the day, this will impact further on the traffic. This simply cannot get the go ahead!!!
|
| 447) |
|
| Daniella thornhill |
|
Street Name, Town: Watson Street, Eccles |
|
This is a terrible idea that may effect the health of my daughter
|
| 446) |
|
| wayne thornhill |
|
Street Name, Town: Watson Street, Eccles |
|
This will ruin the area and make our houses worthless.
|
| 445) |
|
| Sam Skittle |
|
Street Name, Town: Brackley Road, Monton, Eccles |
|
On Salford City Radio’s Jean’s Elevenses show this morning (16.02.10) the question of why housing is not proposed for the Mitchell Shackleton site - as opposed to the awful and completely unsuitable and inappropriate use now being actively developed "behind closed doors" - was raised. According to the developers however, this is what they first wanted to build on the site, but unfortunately Salford City Council's planners blocked this future use for the site, and instead effectively insisted the current proposals be forced upon the residents of Eccles and Monton and Patricroft against their collective wills!
Moreover, when Jean interviewed Councillor Derek Antrobus on her show some time ago he stated there was nothing he, as Lead Menber for the Salford Planning Department, nor any of his political colleagues could do to save the old and splendid Art Deco buildings on the Mitchell Shackleton site - which were finally, and scandalously, obliterated only a couple of weeks ago - nor to steer any development on the site in the (right) direction the surrounding community would wish it to be steered in.
The naked truth is however, that Derek Antrobus personally blocked the proposal to build houses on the site by lobbying and directing his planning committee colleagues, whom he presides over, to oppose the planning application when it went before Salford City Council's Planning Committee!
Watch out! - nobody may be trusted in this matter.
|
| 444) |
|
| P. Blair |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Manchester |
|
 Tuesday, 16. February 2010 15:20
No way should things like this be even suggested in a residential area. They should build it on waste land ouside the city
|
| 443) |
|
| Bethan Pickup |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley |
|
We already have poor air quality in this area from all the motorways (reflected in the high incidence of chronic conditions such as asthma in the area)- this facility would seriously affect the overall health and well-being of local people.
|
| 442) |
|
| Beth Playfoot |
|
Street Name, Town: Off Monton Road, Monton |
|
under no circumstances should this be allowed to happen. The traffic already is an issue but the thoughts of an incinerator so close to the community begs belief!!!!!!
|
| 441) |
|
| C Beardmore |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane |
|
 Tuesday, 16. February 2010 10:42
No thanks there is enough traffic already
|
| 440) |
|
| Richard Shine |
|
Street Name, Town: Perivale Close |
|
I am strongly against the installation of a waste processing and incineration plant. Particularly in a redisdential area. The impact on house prices will be detrimental, in both direct house value and the impact caused by increased industrial traffic and health affects which have been very well publicised and will deter potential buyers moving to the area.
|
| 439) |
|
| Austin Helps |
|
Street Name, Town: Dovedale Avenue, Monton |
|
There must be plenty of alternative sites more suitable than a residential area.
|
| 438) |
|
| Graham Niven |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
There are plenty of industrial areas to build this facility - but not here.!
|
| 437) |
|
| Alan Garnett |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park Eccles |
|
 Saturday, 13. February 2010 16:34
Very worried about possible consequences
|
| 436) |
|
| Nicholas Gilmour |
|
Street Name, Town: Roe Green, Worsley |
|
Don't really think it's a good idea to have this kind of thing in the area!
|
| 435) |
|
| Mrs J Goodman |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Friday, 12. February 2010 15:38
Very worried about possible consequences
|
| 434) |
|
| Richard Head |
|
Street Name, Town: is it monton or winton? |
|
 Friday, 12. February 2010 00:10
i want it! go for it! i'd like to die wile i'm still young! i'd hate to die a wizened 90 year old fogy of old age when this could kill me now! bring it on!
|
| 433) |
|
| John Chesworth |
|
Street Name, Town: Brentwood Drive |
|
No thanks
|
| 432) |
|
| Noel Gaskell |
|
Street Name, Town: Chatsworth Road, Worsley |
|
This proposed development is not acceptable and should not be allowed to proceed.
|
| 431) |
|
| R.J. & L.SAUNDERS |
|
Street Name, Town: ,SWANAGE ROAD WINTON |
|
TRAFFIC ON WORSLEY RD.WINTON,PARRIN LANE
AND MONTON RD.IS ALREADY A NIGHTMARE IN THE MORNINGS AND EVENINGS ADDING ANOTHER
100 OR MORE HGV'S PER DAY IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE.
|
| 430) |
|
| nel johnson |
|
Street Name, Town: algernon street, monton |
|
I want to SAY NO!
|
| 429) |
|
| Kirsten Ward |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road, Monton |
|
Monton is a lovely area to live in. Please don't spoil this with a development wholly unsuited to a residential area.
|
| 428) |
|
| Lindsay Kirkby |
|
Street Name, Town: Crawford Street, Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 10. February 2010 18:37
This is a residential area and there is already too much traffic through
Monton.
|
| 427) |
|
| Lee |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank |
|
 Wednesday, 10. February 2010 18:18
|
| 426) |
|
| A Pugh |
|
Street Name, Town: Sandwich Road |
|
 Wednesday, 10. February 2010 15:26
Madness
|
| 425) |
|
| Mr.G.Coeulle |
|
Street Name, Town: Parkstone Lane, Worsley |
|
The siting of a waste dumping facility in such close proximity to residential properties is completely unacceptable, both on health and aesthetic grounds.
The large number of traffic movements will inevitably exacerbate an already poor traffic situation in Monton and Worsley.
|
| 424) |
|
| jack |
|
Street Name, Town: winton |
|
a deffo from me...
|
| 423) |
|
| Vee Morris |
|
Street Name, Town: Thorn Rd |
|
 Wednesday, 10. February 2010 09:28
This plan is an outrage, just like those who are proposing it. I'm all for helping the environment but not at the cost of my families health and wellbeing. Pollution is bad enough without this! Power in numbers, it cannot go ahead!
|
| 422) |
|
| Helen Holmes |
|
Street Name, Town: Houghton Lane, Swinton |
|
I'm really adverse to this proposal. It will have a massive impact on the areas traffic and I'm worried about the health issues and smell surrounding this plant. This sort of plant should be in a non-residential area not slap bang in the middle of Monton. It has to be stopped.
|
| 421) |
|
| John Brocklehurst |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 9. February 2010 16:44
The one near the trafford centre is bad enough. why make the whole of salford stink? no point!
|
| 420) |
|
| Sue Bradbury |
|
Street Name, Town: Pendleton |
|
My grandchildren go to school in the area and my brother lives in the area, if the stench from this incinerator emits the same stench from the recycling plant on Frederick Road Pendleton then God help the residents. The smell from the sewage plant in Trafford is bad enough. These places should be put as far away from residential areas as possible. Once its there you'll have no chance of getting rid!!!!
|
| 419) |
|
| Patricia Furey |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
 Monday, 8. February 2010 20:07
I am totally opposed to this idea...grrrr
|
| 418) |
|
| Jason Errington |
|
Street Name, Town: Grange Road |
|
 Monday, 8. February 2010 20:04
Don't want my children growing up living near an incinerator! It is bad enough children having to grow up around people being shot and houses being robbed!!
|
| 417) |
|
| claire furey |
|
Street Name, Town: grange road |
|
 Monday, 8. February 2010 20:02
The area is too residential for these plans!
|
| 416) |
|
| Ruth Trowbridge |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley/Winton |
|
There is far too much traffic as it is, even outside of rush hour its too busy. with trafford park nearby, old trafford, the trafford centre, the motorways and local roads get inundated as it is without adding further disruption with HGV's.
Let alone polluting the air near residential areas and schools, there is little fresh air left around anywhere, we dont need or want this!
|
| 415) |
|
| Lyn Boardman |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
My children attend a school which would be stones throw from this site - how can this project even be considered
|
| 414) |
|
| paula white |
|
Street Name, Town: stafford road |
|
The town of Eccles is a complete dump in its existing state. Nobody can deny it is in dire need of regeneration funding.
The BBC is currently relocating thousands of their London employee’s to the new Media City in Trafford Park, only a stones throw away from where we live. These newcomers will all be looking to rent or purchase local property. The influx of new people will stimulate the local community and assist in its economic growth, ensuring our local shops and businesses have the chance they deserve to survive and thrive. Surely common sense should prevail and the funding allocated to this mega dump should be reallocated into making our surroundings something to be proud of and not forced into further decline.
|
| 413) |
|
| Ian |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Road, Alder Forrest |
|
 Monday, 8. February 2010 00:55
I agree with the person on the MVCA forum who said a small nuclear power station on that site would be far safer than this proposal!
|
| 412) |
|
| Sally |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley Rd. Alder Forrest |
|
 Monday, 8. February 2010 00:47
You only have to look on a map to see just how heavily built up the area is - IT'S TOTALLY UNSUITABLE FOR THIS PLANT! Someone must be having a laugh! Or is this just to get us wound up while they sneak something through which is almost as bad?
|
| 411) |
|
| brenda griffin |
|
Street Name, Town: worsley |
|
 Sunday, 7. February 2010 17:06
 say no to incineraters my granchildren are growing up round the corner there is enough polution without this
|
| 410) |
|
| Nicola |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Avenue |
|
 Sunday, 7. February 2010 16:27
Why on earth would Salford Council even consider a waste processing plant in the middle of a residential area and close to many schools???
Salford and Trafford already have heavily polluted air, with almost every child I know having asthma, why would you want to make the situation worse?
This proposal is stupid and will not get the support of the local population.
|
| 409) |
|
| D valentine |
|
Street Name, Town: Queen victoria st PATRICROFT |
|
 Sunday, 7. February 2010 16:23
FOR THE HEALTH OF OUR CHILDREN
WHO LIVE HERE, GO TO SCHOOL HERE, PLAY HERE , WHO WE WANT TO GROW UP HERE THIS CANNOT HAPPEN
|
| 408) |
|
| Craig Johnson |
|
Street Name, Town: Bradgreen Road |
|
Why put this waste site in the middle of a residential area. I hope the council throw this proposal out it is ridiculous and I carn't believe it has being given any consideration at all.
|
| 407) |
|
| Steve |
|
Street Name, Town: Hawthorn Ave Monton |
|
 Sunday, 7. February 2010 13:17
Incinerators are built out of towns and not close to residential areas!!
Why Monton???
|
| 406) |
|
| alison |
|
Street Name, Town: monton Road, Monton |
|
This has got to be the worst possible plan ive ever heard.
The reasons are obvious....pollution, noise, traffic etc... and just bringing down the area.
Say no to this crazy idea !!!!!
|
| 405) |
|
| Tina |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Absolutely the most ridiculas of ideas!  !
How will Monton Road cope with the mass of lorries?? There will only be one direction for them because of the low level bridge.  Not to mention the pollution!
|
| 404) |
|
| Susan Miller |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea |
|
 Saturday, 6. February 2010 22:29
Why put this facility slap bang in the middle of a residential area? It's bonkers and asking for trouble!
|
| 403) |
|
| Stan Chapman |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
 Saturday, 6. February 2010 20:12
No way this should be allowed to happen!
|
| 402) |
|
| Ben |
|
Street Name, Town: Queen Victoria Street, Eccles |
|
I Think that the roads in and around my house are in a bad state of repair already, this is a disgraceful proposal which should be rejected very quickly.
|
| 401) |
|
| disgruntled resident |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens, Monton |
|
I live across the canal from this proposed development and strongly object whole-hartedly. The traffic noise from Green Lane is already bad and will only get worse. We don't want more traffic.... things can get bad enough round here as it is!! - let alone the smell!
The canal banks and pathways have just undergone a huge regeneration programme and look fantastic. What was the point in them doing all that work if all people will see is an glorified rubbish dump.
|
| 400) |
|
| Nicola Grimshaw |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Saturday, 6. February 2010 12:55
I object. An increase in heavy traffic would spoil the villagey atmosphere of Monton.
|
| 399) |
|
| David Grimshaw |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Saturday, 6. February 2010 12:51
I object as this could be better used as a residential area overlooking the canal.
|
| 398) |
|
| Ken Hoath |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea, Eccles |
|
Eccles is a town that is in need of high quality facilities, improvements to existing properties and major repair to roads. What do get? ‘Traffic calming’, which damages vehicles and creates traffic grid lock, green belt erosion, limited parking and poor facilities for children. This ‘development’ will undoubtedly create further delays for traffic, noise and increase pollution. ‘Not in my back yard’ is often heard, but this monstrosity is without a shadow of doubt not suitable in Eccles, let alone next to residential properties. I am not against industrial use, but there is a huge difference from what Mitchell & Shackleton was and the former ROF on Green Lane, to what will be if this ridiculous ‘facility’ goes ahead. We need to fight extremely hard against this one.
|
| 397) |
|
| Sally Griffiths |
|
Street Name, Town: Algernon Street, Monton |
|
No thanks
|
| 396) |
|
| Nicola |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane Winton |
|
 Friday, 5. February 2010 12:10
How can 160+ HGVs using the small amount of routes to green lane be of benefit to the already stand still traffic situation we have?? This cant be tolerated and must not go ahead. Even the dare mention of the plant has led to a decrease in house prices as people are concerned for their health and future.
|
| 395) |
|
| Gareth Bartley |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
I have no idea how they can even attempt to build this in a residential area.
IT HAS TO BE STOPPED!
|
| 394) |
|
| Anthony Davies |
|
Street Name, Town: Walker Road Eccles |
|
Why is this being built in such a densly populated area, definatley no
|
| 393) |
|
| the unsworths. |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 Thursday, 4. February 2010 21:32
we are against the proposal.
|
| 392) |
|
| A knight |
|
Street Name, Town: Folly Lane |
|
 Thursday, 4. February 2010 19:04
A definite no.....
|
| 391) |
|
| Philippa King |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens |
|
 Thursday, 4. February 2010 13:07
I live across the canal from this proposed development and strongly object. The traffic noise from Green Lane is already bad and will only get worse.
The canal banks and pathways have just undergone a huge regeneration programme and look fantastic. What was the point in them doing all that work if all people will see is an glorified rubbish dump.
|
| 390) |
|
| Victoria Ball |
|
Street Name, Town: Queen Victoria Street, Eccles |
|
I don't want this near my house for several reasons - traffic, pollution, noise, eyesore.....the list is endless. say no!
|
| 389) |
|
| John Agnew |
|
Street Name, Town: Vicars Hall Lane, Boothstown. |
|
This should not be allowed in an urban area with such close proximity to homes and schools.
|
| 388) |
|
| John Johnston |
|
Street Name, Town: Pine Grove Monton |
|
Why cannot this be located at one of existing tip location eg. Agecroft
|
| 387) |
|
| Bruce Hulmes |
|
Street Name, Town: Grange Drive,Monton |
|
Don't mince words lets tell these corrupt local and national politicians that we are the power, it is we whom placed them in office and they do as we tell them or they will all be looking for re-employment elsewhere very soon.
Remember that if the Labour and Tories do not start listening there is an up and coming party that will.
|
| 386) |
|
| Alicia Connor |
|
Street Name, Town: Corbel Way |
|
 Wednesday, 3. February 2010 13:16
This should be stopped now - for the community and the area.
Health, safety and traffic will all be affected.
|
| 385) |
|
| Ciaran Black |
|
Street Name, Town: Corbel Way, Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 3. February 2010 13:14
This is no way to develop the community. These plans should be scrapped immediately!!!
|
| 384) |
|
| Duncan Machin |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Rd, Monton |
|
Area is far too residential for the planned development it would have a dramatic effect on traffic in an already busy area not to mention the air and noise pollution it will cause.
|
| 383) |
|
| Sarah Purang |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road |
|
 Wednesday, 3. February 2010 08:51
It would cause too much traffic and would pollute the air with god knows what gases - not to mention all the lorries passing through. Traffic is bad enough through Monton.
|
| 382) |
|
| VS |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
I am soon to move to monton village, and am appaled to find they want to build such a plant so near to residential property. It is absolutely ridiculous there is plenty of waste land away from residential property for this type of plant. I thought monton village has a preservation order??? NO NO NO NO clear off and go somewhere else. This land should be use for something that would benefit the community NOT DESTROY IT & its residents. PLEASE PLEASE STOP THIS
|
| 381) |
|
| Judith |
|
Street Name, Town: Maldon Drive |
|
|
| 380) |
|
| christopher ferris |
|
Street Name, Town: warren drive |
|
stupid idea
|
| 379) |
|
| Simon Thomas |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
 Monday, 1. February 2010 20:16
A more suitable non-residential area must be located
|
| 378) |
|
| I Wild |
|
Street Name, Town: Swanage Road, Winton |
|
 Monday, 1. February 2010 15:04
Already too much traffic in the area & set to worsen with Barton Dock approval. This will only make things worse coupled with threats of pollution.
|
| 377) |
|
| Stephanie Wild |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
This proposal would be severely detrimental to the local area.
It would cause further increases to traffic congestion on Green Lane (already burdened by the UPS depot) and property prices will be adversley effected.
I am also concerned about the potential for harmful emissions being released into the air I breathe.
I am certainly in favour of helping the environment but a plant such as this must be situated well away from residential areas.
It cannot go ahead.
|
| 376) |
|
| steven ferris |
|
Street Name, Town: warren drive |
|
|
| 375) |
|
| Patrick O'Shea |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 1. February 2010 10:29
Are these people for real? Do they think we will lie down and accept this?
Take us on at your peril.
|
| 374) |
|
| GILL JOHNSON |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 1. February 2010 09:00
A definate NO from me and my family. Surely Hazel Blears should do more to ensure that this does not go ahead!
|
| 373) |
|
| Mark |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Sunday, 31. January 2010 19:46
No way. This area is clearly a thriving residential suburb!
|
| 372) |
|
| Stephanie |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Sunday, 31. January 2010 19:45
Trafford Park exists for the siting of this kind of industrial activity. There is no way this dump should be being considered in such close proximity to the communities of Monton, Winton and Ellesmere Park. For once will the Council please put people before profit.
|
| 371) |
|
| Terry Sosata |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
 Sunday, 31. January 2010 16:31
Is this another one of Cllr Merry and his crazy gang's ideas to make Salford an aspirational place to live. We listen to their annecdotes about tranforming the lives of Salfordians.
HUMPH
We will all have six fingers and toes, chronic bronchitis and god knows what else.
This is a joke and MUST NOT be allowed
|
| 370) |
|
| HELEN TYLER |
|
Street Name, Town: mount drive, stockport |
|
I feel very strongly about the lasting effects this horrific waste incinerator/treatment plant will have on the community of Monton and the welfare of the families and children who live in this small village. This should not be aloud in a place where regeneration is taking place plus there are many schools in and around this area who will be heavily affects by the number of lorries trawling through on a day to day basis, not to mention the pollution.
|
| 369) |
|
| Adam Laing |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
If only the council would have changed the land usage from industrial. Easy to do. We could have had the eco village then. Well done Salford council. Another display of inept bureaucracy.
|
| 368) |
|
| Ann Farr |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens |
|
I live the other side of the canal from where all these HGV'S Will be travelling and will be disturbed by the noise from the extra traffic. I had not realised the amount of traffic the plant would generate. Also I will be minding my grandson and do not want the toxic waste affecting him
|
| 367) |
|
| darren swindells |
|
Street Name, Town: montonmillgardens,eccles |
|
we have young children,no way to this.
|
| 366) |
|
| GH |
|
Street Name, Town: Liverpool Road, Eccles |
|
 Saturday, 30. January 2010 02:07
There are better uses for the site, and better sites for the purpose.
|
| 365) |
|
| JASON WILSON |
|
Street Name, Town: WATSON ST., |
|
I CAME TO THE MEETING ON WEDNESDAY AND THE GUY FROM SKY PROPERTIES WAS TALKING OUT OF HIS RECTUM. ENERGOS ARE AN INCOMPETANT CO. & HAVE A TRACK RECORD OF TOXIC SPILLAGES IN THE NEWCASTLE.
|
| 364) |
|
| George Wrigglesworth |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Rd |
|
I agree with the protest.
|
| 363) |
|
| jane and tony |
|
Street Name, Town: ellesmere rd |
|
 Friday, 29. January 2010 22:48
This proposal is nuts, we know it and me thinks they know it !!!
|
| 362) |
|
| Tony Carlin |
|
Street Name, Town: Highfield Drive Monton |
|
Just about every arguement against this proposal has already been posted already. Happy to lend my support to any initiative that prevents this happening.
|
| 361) |
|
| L Gartley |
|
Street Name, Town: Bray Avenue, Winton |
|
 Friday, 29. January 2010 21:37
There's too much traffic around Monton and Winton already. Nobody wants this Eco Site.
|
| 360) |
|
| T Barratt |
|
Street Name, Town: Napier Road, Monton |
|
 Friday, 29. January 2010 21:32
Not interested in having this Eco Site in Monton. No thanks!!!!
|
| 359) |
|
| Kevin Purcell |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonfields Road Monton, |
|

What on earth is our local athority thinking of! they should seize this opportunity of public opposition to re zone the area for residential use,
Large dirty industrial plants in the heart of towns are as popular as outside toilets and air raid shelters and clog's
|
| 358) |
|
| P Barratt |
|
Street Name, Town: Napier road,Monton |
|
 Friday, 29. January 2010 18:02
No Thanks
|
| 357) |
|
| Rachel Walsh |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road, Monton |
|
 Friday, 29. January 2010 16:54
This proposal is extremely worrying - the main conc3rn being the health and well being of our families. It is not an apropriate site for this type of business and for the level of traffic.
|
| 356) |
|
| Janette Burrows |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
 Friday, 29. January 2010 14:54
Many thanks for all the information I will now be looking for house out of Monton
|
| 355) |
|
| Danny Jones |
|
Street Name, Town: Crawford Street, Monton |
|
An urban area surrounded by housing is not the best location for this type of facility. There are far more suitable locations where the impact would be more acceptable.
|
| 354) |
|
| Sue Price |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
No Thanks - Too close to home
|
| 353) |
|
| Dave Wilson |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonfields Road, Monton |
|
The Mitchell and Shackleton site is not a suitable location for the waste transfer facility - it will caus traffic congestion, noise & pollution, and I object to it.
|
| 352) |
|
| Neil |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonfields Road, Monton |
|
 Thursday, 28. January 2010 10:16
I strongly oppose this plan. The site is totally inappropriate for such a plant. The impact on local residents would be terrible, particularly regarding health and increased traffic congestion. I have a young family and do not want them having to breathe toxic pollutants and be endangered by even more HGV's on our already busy roads.
Surely common sense says that a waste plant like this doesn't belong in a residential area - Surely Trafford Park is much more suitable, or another brownfield site well away from houses and playgrounds.
|
| 351) |
|
| Neil Delargy |
|
Street Name, Town: Boothstown |
|
 Thursday, 28. January 2010 09:18
How did this even get to the planning stage. There's better sites than Green Lane.
|
| 350) |
|
| Andrew Gough |
|
Street Name, Town: Highfield Drive |
|
Recently moved into a house in Monton to start a family, don't want them growing up near a dump/incinerator. That's why we live in Monton! If this makes it through planning, then some one somewhere is making money under the table
|
| 349) |
|
| Matthew Mould |
|
Street Name, Town: Anson St |
|
What the hell is wrong with a site in Trafford Park? No houses there, no children to be born with defects, no affecting house prices, no anything.......it's a industrial site. Fine, this site used to be a industrial site too but there was never a incinerator there. If this goes through then Salford City Council is a joke!
|
| 348) |
|
| Alan Shinwell |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Moved to Monton from a house we loved to get away from noise of incinerator at Hope Hospital; that was already built - damned if I'm going to let this happen again!
|
| 347) |
|
| Sharon Shinwell |
|
Street Name, Town: Bledlow Close, Eccles |
|
we had to move house from near Salford Royal Hospital because of the constant high pitched sound emitted from their incinerator that stopped you being able to sit outside or leave windows open, now 3 years on it looks like we may end up with the same problem!
|
| 346) |
|
| DARREN |
|
Street Name, Town: MONTONDALE |
|
 Tuesday, 26. January 2010 16:35
HOW TO RUIN A VILLAGE
|
| 345) |
|
| Zoe Carroll |
|
Street Name, Town: Montondale, Monton |
|
I can not understand how is could have ever been proposed so close to a residental area. I am strongly against this proposal.
|
| 344) |
|
| Mrs J Page |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
This is a crazy idea which anyone in their right mind would object to. Why can the Council not buy it back and develop it into something that's really needed like something for the local kids.
|
| 343) |
|
| Lesley Holland |
|
Street Name, Town: Bradgreen Road, Monton |
|
No thanks!
|
| 342) |
|
| Dominic Gill |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank, Monton |
|
Disgusting! The traffic is going to be horrendous not to mention the toxic fumes. This must not be allowed to go ahead.
|
| 341) |
|
| l. bennett |
|
Street Name, Town: merrydale avenue, monton |
|
 Tuesday, 26. January 2010 08:09
What happened to the clean air act? I am completely opposed to this project.
Do the lorry contractors know they will only be able to operate between 9-30am and 4-00pm? The rest of the time the area is gridlocked.
|
| 340) |
|
| A & F Cullimore |
|
Street Name, Town: Preston Ave Eccles |
|
 Tuesday, 26. January 2010 08:06
we say no to the incinerator
|
| 339) |
|
| ian david munro |
|
Street Name, Town: 5 lansdowne road monton |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 23:05
 how come they wont to put it were kids play out there all ready no room now there is going to be over160 hgv going up and down my road when i bought my house over 20 years ago so when i come to sell maybe in the near future will i get what i wont no not with this thing at the bottom of the road i ask the question would chairman of sky properties wont the developing outside his house answer NO so why should we
|
| 338) |
|
| Chris Speight |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
I am competely against the proposed plan for the Green lane waste site. Monton is a residential area and completely unsuitable for this type of development, the traffic in Monton is horrendous as it is and the planned 160 (additional) trucks ploughing their way through the area will make it completely grid locked. In addition no matter what the developers say there will be pollution, how many times have i driven to the municipal tip in Bolton and been confronted with rubbish lining the main road to the site?
|
| 337) |
|
| Claire Senior |
|
Street Name, Town: Bradford Road, Monton |
|
I am strongly against the proposals
|
| 336) |
|
| Emily Dawes |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road, Monton |
|
I am strongly against the proposed plan. It will effect everybody who lives here in some way every single day. I have asthma and I do not want my health to be affected either. Monton is a great place to live and I hope the community stand together on this matter and Say No to Green Lane Waste Site!
|
| 335) |
|
| Des Dawes |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
The impact on the local community will be considerable as experience in other sites has proved. The local residents will be the ones who suffer and the organsers of the project need to realise that they would not like it in their neighbourhood - so why should the residents have to have accept it. Why can the site not be positioned in a more industrialised area where the impact will be less.
|
| 334) |
|
| Georgina Deer |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Road,Eccles |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 19:46
If we all have a say in this and make our views known then surely the council and decision makers will listen.This site is far better suited to residential use.So the more people who object the better!
|
| 333) |
|
| Annette Kapur |
|
Street Name, Town: Catherine Road, Swinton |
|
Can't even believe this was considered since it is so close to a residential area. Let's hope our labour council are wise in an election year!
|
| 332) |
|
| SUE |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
AS THIS ONLINE PETITION ONLY COUNTS AS ONE OBJECTION - PLEASE EVERYONE WRITE A LETTER TO OPPOSE WHICH COUNTS AS AN INDIVIDUAL OBJECTION
I'M TOTALLY AGAINST THE WASTE TRANSFER FACILITY - DONT WANT NOISE, TRAFFIC & POLLUTION IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA
|
| 331) |
|
| daniel simpson |
|
Street Name, Town: cromwell road eccles |
|
due to the close proximaty of my neighbourhood i am strongly against this proposal. It annoys me how they could even consider the site due to all the health risks and how close it is to residential property,the traffic alone would be a nightmare as it is bad enough PLEASE DONT LET THIS HAPPEN......
|
| 330) |
|
| Jane Mallinson |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Totally inappropriate use of local land. It's hard to understand how residents in Monton, Winton Eccles and beyond benefit from this facility. Can Salford Local Government find a more suitable use that would benefit the community?
|
| 329) |
|
| Phill Horan |
|
Street Name, Town: Crawford St Monton |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 18:29
Totally inappropriate immediately adjacent to residential area. Roads are stretched already locally without adding countless wagons into the area as well. A huge choice of brownfield sites exist around Manchester and Salford, this is categorically the wrong choice
|
| 328) |
|
| Tom Arnold |
|
Street Name, Town: 1 Clifton Avenue |
|
Say no to the incinerator!
|
| 327) |
|
| John Cullen |
|
Street Name, Town: Algernon Street Monton |
|
I admire and respect the work done by The MVRA amd groups like yours to raise Monton's profile as a shopping area and desirable place to live. This scheme would undo all the work put in over many years. I say NO to the threat of pollution, NO to the trucks clogging up Monton and NO to the loss of quality of life that would inevitably follow.
|
| 326) |
|
| Vicky Cooper |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens |
|
This needs to be stopped. Not only will it cause all kinds of problems it is a risk to health. we will be infested with rodents and it will down value our houses. not to mention the smells we shall get from it
|
| 325) |
|
| Susan Greenhalgh |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 16:34
I think Monton has enough taffic passing through as it is and really doesn't need any more especially heavy duty vehicles.Monton is a residential area and to propose building a incinerator alongside the motorway link we already have running through Winton/Eccles/Monton is ridiculous, how much polution do they feel that residents of Monton and surrounding towns have to take in fact why don't they just have done with it and have a nuclear reactor built next to it that would look nice on the local post cards next to the Bridgewater Canal. Wise up and think of what this would really do to our health .
|
| 324) |
|
| C Henning |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane Monton |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 16:15
As well as being an eysore, the amount of extra traffic congesttion will cause even more pollution so NO thank you
|
| 323) |
|
| Christine Law |
|
Street Name, Town: Toad Pond Close,SwintonM27 0bw |
|
This area is seriously congested already and following the decimation of Swinton precinct by charging for car parking etc I think that adding problems, which could affect one of the few thriving local shopping and restaurant areas is madness.
|
| 322) |
|
| R Moores |
|
Street Name, Town: ellesmere park, eccles |
|
Disgraceful for even considering it in a residential area. Complain to your MP and tell him/her they will be voted out at the next election if this goes ahead.
|
| 321) |
|
| Helen Poole |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 13:03
I just don't get how this could possibly be a sensible idea? Far too near residential areas.
|
| 320) |
|
| Simon Lowe |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 12:42
It is totally inappropriate to build this kind of facility so close to a residential area.
|
| 319) |
|
| Sarah Moran |
|
Street Name, Town: Alexandra Road, Ashton |
|
I work in this area and, health implications aside, feel that additional traffic will add to the existing problems making this a totally inappropriate location for this facility.
|
| 318) |
|
| Vivien Corns |
|
Street Name, Town: Watson St, Eccles |
|
No, No, No to the Incinerator!!!
|
| 317) |
|
| N. J. Higham |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
 Monday, 25. January 2010 08:46
This is an inappopriate location for the proposed development.
|
| 316) |
|
| carol popland, norman popland |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
we say no to this and it is stupid to build it just course pollution.
|
| 315) |
|
| S Walsh |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 21:46
Unacceptable!
|
| 314) |
|
| K Walsh |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 21:45
No, no, no!
|
| 313) |
|
| E Bickerdike |
|
Street Name, Town: Cromwell Road, Eccles |
|
I would like my children to go outside without fear of what they are breating in, plus the traffic is a no no, we have enough with the trafford centre!!
|
| 312) |
|
| C Hatton |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 21:24
It would not be wise to build a waste site this close to peoples homes and places of work.
|
| 311) |
|
| Nick Davis |
|
Street Name, Town: Chatsworth Road, Eccles |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 17:48
The local roads are already congested and will not cope with the proposed volume of traffic. Waste treatment plsnts should not be located in or neaar to residential areas.
|
| 310) |
|
| Simon A |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 16:09
This is not the correct place for such a facility. Nobody wants this.
|
| 309) |
|
| Kathryn A |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 16:08
I am not impressed at all. We do not want this and it is very near to residential areas and a children's park.
|
| 308) |
|
| J. Cheshire. |
|
Street Name, Town: Algenon st. monton |
|
Noooooooooo
Noooooooooo
What part of NO dont you understand??
Light commercial/industrial OK...
|
| 307) |
|
| Viv Cogswell |
|
Street Name, Town: Milford Street, Salford |
|
I hope the council stand up and block these plans
|
| 306) |
|
| Mrs N Connolly |
|
Street Name, Town: Greenwood Place Eccles |
|
A residential area is not an appropriate place to build a waste site.
|
| 305) |
|
| Heather McDonald |
|
Street Name, Town: Napier Road, Monton |
|
This is a ridiculous proposal and I can't believe that it is being given any consideration at all! There are plenty of dumps around Salford, Monton isn't currently one of them! I imagine that the landowner, having been refused permission to build houses on the site, has thought of the worst possible thing he could put there instead to create public outrage and force the council to rethink the first option. Personally, I don't see a problem with houses being put there, or something for the community, there's a great community spirit in Monton despite the shortage in amenities, any increase in those amenities is bound to have a disproportionate effect on the community. An incinerator adds nothing to Monton but takes away pretty much everything...I certainly would not move to an area with an incinerator on my doorstep and will be moving out of it if one is built (assuming that the value of my house isn't completely annihilated!)
|
| 304) |
|
| Rebecca Best |
|
Street Name, Town: Belmont St, Monton |
|
I do not want this near to where I live. It is unsightly and very unsettling so close to a residential area and would not benefit the local community. It would make far more sense to use the land as a local amenity such as a childrens playground, which this area is seriously lacking, in addition to some affordable housing for local families. This development as it stands would only hinder the future success of Monton as an attractive village and possibly even destroy it's core nature.
|
| 303) |
|
| Mike sheehy |
|
Street Name, Town: Belmont St ,Monton |
|
Developers and Salford Council,walking over the residents wishes as usual....enough is enough,This must be stopped
|
| 302) |
|
| David&Kev Warburton-Broadhurst |
|
Street Name, Town: Chatsworth Road, Ellesmere Pk |
|
 Sunday, 24. January 2010 11:09
This site is not suitable for industrial use as it is in the middle of a residential area and will have a serious impact on health from both emissions and traffic congestion (160 HGV's PER DAY)on an area already gridlocked at rush-hour for Monton, Patricroft, Eccles, Worsley and the surronding area.
|
| 301) |
|
| Jo Rutter |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Green Lane is not a suitable site for a development of this kind - the roads through Monton are too busy already.
|
| 300) |
|
| Malcolm Bell |
|
Street Name, Town: Wesley St,Patricroft |
|
The proposed development is not suitable for a site which is so close to residental areas.
The current infrastrure is not suitable for the increased levels of transport.
|
| 299) |
|
| Joanne Bracegirdle-Bell |
|
Street Name, Town: Wesley Street, Patricroft |
|
It is unbelievable that this would be considered for a residential area. Green lane could not cope with the HGV traffic, Green lane has already had its fair share of tragedy though fatal traffic accidents to have around 160 HGVs everyday added would no doubt increase this record never mind the congestion this will cause and Green lane is home to a school and a centre for troubled children, why increase the danger for these children.
We already suffer from the occasional vermin problems in the yards and gardens due to the train lines and the canal, put a dump in too and I am sure this will double the trouble
|
| 298) |
|
| Phil D |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Saturday, 23. January 2010 19:25
Not an appropriate site for such a development, I strongly oppose this proposition!
|
| 297) |
|
| Frances MacDonald |
|
Street Name, Town: c/o Montonfields Rd. |
|
 Saturday, 23. January 2010 19:23
Why would you put a dump in a village?
|
| 296) |
|
| R BENNETT |
|
Street Name, Town: MERRYDALE AVENUE, ECCLES |
|
 Saturday, 23. January 2010 19:01
An incinerator plant spewing its toxic fumes into the air less than two miles from Salford Royal Hospital is not exactly a good idea. Also the long term health problems to both young and old will take years to become evident.
I cannot think of a more ludicrous location than slap bang in the middle of a residential area fed by minor, congested roads. Let Trafford Park have it, or are Salford Council rubbing their hands at the thought of the cash incentives?
|
| 295) |
|
| John.S. |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Saturday, 23. January 2010 18:24
Will Councillors and MP’s please note:- One of your main duties is to represent the people who took the time to vote you into office. You should not wait to be asked to get involved in local issues, especially this one where common sense should tell you that a proposed site such as this should be as far from residents as possible with an easily accessible route so as to cause minimal disruption to daily life. The residents of Monton take pride in their village (thanks to the hard work of “ Monton Village Community Association” ) and they would like to keep it that way. So come on Salford council take a lead from the residents and try to build something to be proud of and earn a genuine pat on the back from the people who elected you.
If you ignore the community and go ahead with this insane plan, I shall be in the queue to claim compensation from you if our property values fall in comparison to other area’s along with claims for any health problems that could arise.
|
| 294) |
|
| Matthew Sephton |
|
Street Name, Town: M50 2SN |
|
This development would be detrimental to the areas of Eccles and Monton as well as other neighbourhoods in the area. I am very happy to be adding my support to this vital campaign for the health and wellbeing of local people and families.
|
| 293) |
|
| Guy Davis |
|
Street Name, Town: godolphin close,ellesmere park |
|
Id rather them build a prison or better still Salford City Airport!
|
| 292) |
|
| Pippa Lewis |
|
Street Name, Town: Hastings road, Winton |
|
This is an inappropriate development for the area. Ridiculously close to Monton and the friendly residential community. Take the dump out to Trafford park - that's already ruined space- we don't need more industrialisation; we need recreational spaces, green spaces, family spaces.
|
| 291) |
|
| E O'Reilly |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 22:10
No, for the probable impact on health
|
| 290) |
|
| Elizabeth Charnley |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 21:23
Until I saw the poster and spoke to Linda in the Queens Arms at Patricroft I had no idea that this was going ahead. Absolutely barmy idea for a residential area with terrible levels of traffic congestion at peak times. Add in oodles of huge lorries trying to get round the narrow roads and the roundabout at the top of Canal Bank and it's a recipe for disaster.
I lead a health walk every Sunday morning at 10am from Monton Green. How attractive is that going to be for those coming for a nice walk in Monton & Worsley's pleasant surroundings if the first thing you see is a procession of HGV's trundling by?
|
| 289) |
|
| Mrs S Clayton |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road Monton |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 21:09
No to this plant
S Clayton:
Monton is a very nice place and it dosen't need this on a site which is surrouded by houses.
|
|
| 288) |
|
| Dr P Goodman |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Our experience of similar dumps is that they create debris in the surrounding area/roads/air. Monton already gridlocks in busy times of day any increase in traffic, especially heavy goods must be essential not just commercially viable. Monton is fast becoming a very attractive town centre after years of neglect. This is a backward step. This is too close to both a residential area and a commercial area. There must be a better site for this.
|
| 287) |
|
| R Harcourt |
|
Street Name, Town: Bradford Rd, Monton |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 19:25
Another brilliant idea NOT.
Although I understand and, indeed would support such an idea for waste recycling and making good use of the energy contained, to think that someone thought it would be a good idea to put it here in a residential area is, frankly, beyond belief.
I used to live near the Urmston waste treatment works (up to 1995) and that was bad enough and still is, even with the new technology employed.
As pointed out in a previous entry, "We have motorways all around us which along with Trafford Park industrial plants, Trafford Centre traffic and Davyhulme Sewage works create just about one of the worst air environments any city could offer. If we add an incinerator to this and all the associated traffic (which our road infrastructure cannot take)this will become insufferable".
I'll second that. In the 15 years I've lived here I've noted the traffic congestion get to almosy insufferable levels. Now this, on top of the bright idea to build the new stadium at barton plus the new port on the canal.
Someone in Salford planning needs to get out and look at exactly what they are doing to the local environment. As far as I can see they living in cukoo land!
|
| 286) |
|
| Marks family |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 19:18
6 votes in this family against this pollution come May. USE YOUR VOTE - MAKE IT COUNT!
|
| 285) |
|
| j shields |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 19:01
why would any1 want this!!!!
|
| 284) |
|
| Julie |
|
Street Name, Town: Salford |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 18:31
Don't spoil this lovely place!
|
| 283) |
|
| Jenny Corns |
|
Street Name, Town: Mirfield Drive, Monton |
|
No to the Incinerator!!! Surely there is a much more suitable place to put it (i.e not a residental area!).
|
| 282) |
|
| Jonathan T. Nicolson |
|
Street Name, Town: Stafford Road, Monton, Eccles |
|
Green Lane is a built up area with a high density of population and inappropriate as the site for a dump and incinerator
|
| 281) |
|
| A & B Holden |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 15:23
This should be built away from residential areas. The proposed site is adjacent to residents' homes and would also create chaos with local and through traffic.
|
| 280) |
|
| Eddie Howarth |
|
Street Name, Town: Walkden, Worsley |
|
Totally the wrong place for this kind of development! Noise, air pollution, traffic!
|
| 279) |
|
| Lee Matthews |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
Does not make sense buiilding this so close to a residential area. The has to be other brownfield sites that would better suit this type of development. What happened to the consulatation?
|
| 278) |
|
| TAMIR LHAGVAA |
|
Street Name, Town: ASHTON ROAD WEST, MANCHESTER |
|
I THINK THIS IS DISUGSTING TO BUILD THE UNDUSTRIAL SHIT IN THE RESEDINTIAL AREA. LEAVE THE INDUSTRIAL STUFF WHERE IT BELONGS WHICH IS INDUSTRIAL AREA. SO NO TO THE INDUSTRIAL INCENRARY ...
GOT IT!!!I KNOW SO...
|
| 277) |
|
| Maddie Tyad |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Friday, 22. January 2010 10:24
No to the incinerator!
|
| 276) |
|
| Eleanor Hill |
|
Street Name, Town: Trent Drive, Worsley |
|
It would be far more sensible to release this land for housing, removing the need for proposed greenbelt development elsewhere in the borough
|
| 275) |
|
| derek banks |
|
Street Name, Town: westminster road |
|
Take it elsewhere.
|
| 274) |
|
| dorothy banks |
|
Street Name, Town: westminster road |
|
No no no x
|
| 273) |
|
| michele ferris |
|
Street Name, Town: warren drive |
|
 Stupid idea.
|
| 272) |
|
| Sue Occleston |
|
Street Name, Town: Trent Drive Walkden |
|
 Planning permission was refused for building houses on this area which is more appropriate. This land WAS used for indusry at one time but is in the middle of residential areas. It is a disgrace that Salford Council are even considering the proposals. Shame on you Salford Council. Local people and others in Salford are against it so listen to those who vote for you and vote against the proposal.
|
| 271) |
|
| Dave Leitch |
|
Street Name, Town: Abito, 85 Greengate |
|
Shocking. I am particularly concerned with the health risk to local residents.
|
| 270) |
|
| Eoan Edwards |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Road, Eccles |
|
No thank you. A plan to open an incinerator in Trafford Park just across the Ship Canal from Eccles failed a few years back so how can one be considered in such a populous area.
|
| 269) |
|
| jt |
|
Street Name, Town: rocky lane, monton |
|
disgusting that this is even being considered, so close to heavily popullated area.
|
| 268) |
|
| Katie Barrett |
|
Street Name, Town: 36 Montonfields Rd |
|
 please don't build this dump near my house!!
|
| 267) |
|
| Carolyne Jones |
|
Street Name, Town: Sale |
|
|
| 266) |
|
| S Turner |
|
Street Name, Town: Dove dale ellesmere park |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 20:36
It's an outrage.
|
| 265) |
|
| E taylor |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 20:25
Have just bought a house in Monton and this is the last thing we want in such a lovely area.
|
| 264) |
|
| Neil Wright |
|
Street Name, Town: Taunton Avenue |
|
Say No to this,there are other areas this could be sited with much less detrement to the local community.
|
| 263) |
|
| Karl Blamire |
|
Street Name, Town: Mirfield Drive, Monton |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 20:03
I have lived in this area all my life and never in my wildest imagination did i ever think that someone would want to put a waste burning rubish dump in the center of a community such as this!
If there are any councillors or planers reading this may i draw your attention to the new by-pass bieng built around Alderly Edge, would it not be easyer to build a "spur" road of this into one of the many empty fields where an "eco"site could be located with very little disruption to the residents (the new road goes around the village), and just think of the banifits newjobs, economic growth and a practical use of the new by-pass!!
|
| 262) |
|
| E Barber |
|
Street Name, Town: Bourne Ave |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:31
No to the incinerator!!
|
| 261) |
|
| Steve Nuttall |
|
Street Name, Town: Gordon Road |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:29
No to the incinerator!!
|
| 260) |
|
| Kate Cooper |
|
Street Name, Town: Gordon Road |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:28
It's too close to home !!!!
|
| 259) |
|
| Mr and Mrs Bould |
|
Street Name, Town: Park Drive |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:13
Stop the incinerator!!
|
| 258) |
|
| Mrs Janet Lockett |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:12
No to the incinerator
|
| 257) |
|
| S Kelly |
|
Street Name, Town: South Avenue |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:11
It's disgusting!
|
| 256) |
|
| Mrs Brenda Saleh |
|
Street Name, Town: Shackleton street |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:11
NO NO NO
|
| 255) |
|
| L Barber |
|
Street Name, Town: Stonyside Walkden |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:08
It's disgusting !!!
|
| 254) |
|
| V Holt |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:04
No NO NO
|
| 253) |
|
| C Barber |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Road |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 19:03
Please don't do this Monton is a lovely place and I want it to stay that way !!!!
|
| 252) |
|
| Anna Ellam |
|
Street Name, Town: Rocky Lane, Monton |
|
We have motorways all around us which along with Trafford Park industrial plants, Trafford Centre traffic and Davyhulme Sewage works create just about one of the worst air environments any city could offer. If we add an incinerator to this and all the associated traffic (which our road infrastructure cannot take)this will become insufferable.
|
| 251) |
|
| Kelly Beckett |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
This is a ridiculous proposition - I am absolutely disgusted.
|
| 250) |
|
| James Naylor |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
Why would anybody in the right frame of mind want to build an incinerator in a residential area, Trafford Park is only minutes away. This is plainly ridiculous!!
|
| 249) |
|
| D.J. Thomas |
|
Street Name, Town: Lancaster Road, Salford |
|
The Mitchell & Shackleton site is not suitable for the waste transfer facility - it will cause traffic congestion, noise & pollution and I object to it.
|
| 248) |
|
| Joanne Hobson |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Ave |
|
Who makes these decisions? It should be built in Trafford Park where there is no residential houses.
|
| 247) |
|
| k. cuthbert |
|
Street Name, Town: Windermere Drive, Alderley Edg |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 17:36
 Monton is such a greenleaf area close to Manchester (A MAJOR CITY IN THE UK) why change
to a dumping ground ie. incinerators!!!!
|
| 246) |
|
| Malcolm Smith |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Village |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 15:09
 If the waste is from Trafford Park surely it would make sense to site the re-cycling plant there!
|
| 245) |
|
| Rachael Thomson |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 14:00
This should not be allowed to happen in a residential area. I strongly oppose this.
|
| 244) |
|
| Ken Peacock |
|
Street Name, Town: Gordon Road Monton |
|
There have been enough changes at Monton, none for the better and we do not need another dump.
|
| 243) |
|
| Samantha Cook |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 13:26
The impact on the traffic and environment in and around Monton will be horrific. This must be stopped for the sake of our childrens future.
|
| 242) |
|
| Mr.& Mrs Pointon |
|
Street Name, Town: Winsford, Cheshire |
|
 Thursday, 21. January 2010 12:57
We don't want our new great grandchild born into a toxic environment. Keep the air clean and follow Mr.Brown's advice.
|
| 241) |
|
| Helen Corns |
|
Street Name, Town: Mirfield Drive, Monton |
|

This cannot go ahead it will ruin the beautiful village of Monton. Use the industrial park down the road....Trafford Park
|
| 240) |
|
| Amie Harris |
|
Street Name, Town: Manchester |
|
I can't believe this would even be considered within such a residential areas with families. There must be a more appropriate place for this - consider the impact on the massive detrimental residents before any decision is made.
|
| 239) |
|
| David Naylor |
|
Street Name, Town: Cumbria |
|
My daughter lives in Monton and we have been visiting since she moved in. The village is improving so much and has a lovely feel to it. The idea of siting an incinerator unit in this residential area which will be serviced by 100 - 200 HGV's per day will destroy the place. There must be other brown field sites more suitable for this.
|
| 238) |
|
| Gill |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
Let's hope we can get enought names and secure the right result to ensure that this site does not get the go ahead!!!
|
| 237) |
|
| Clare McKnight |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park |
|
The idea itself is a travesty! Monton is a lovley part of Manchester hence why we moved here. I do not want to be exposed to such fumes and toxins let alone my 2 pre schoolers.
|
| 236) |
|
| Laurie |
|
Street Name, Town: s |
|
Not happening, its a disgusting idea
|
| 235) |
|
| Ödül Bozkurt |
|
Street Name, Town: Rocky Lane, Monton |
|
The plan is simply preposterous. Monton is one of the few outstandingly pleasant in this part of Greater Manchester and it's such a contradiction to put this plant there.
|
| 234) |
|
| abdul mannan |
|
Street Name, Town: stafford road |
|
This facility must be stopped. Monton is not an industrial estate. All residents must unite to stop this.
|
| 233) |
|
| Irma White |
|
Street Name, Town: Quakerfields Bolton |
|
I'm a regular visitor to Monton. NO NO to this DUMP.
|
| 232) |
|
| steven goddard |
|
Street Name, Town: barton lane eccles |
|
NO NO NO
|
| 231) |
|
| Cristina Whitworth |
|
Street Name, Town: Sandringham Drive Brinscall |
|
Monton is a lovely, residential area. Why spoil it?
|
| 230) |
|
| David Neal |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Rd. Monton. |
|
Putting it quite simply , it dosen't belong here , the traffic chaos will be even worse than it is , and I would much prefer to breathe clean air.
|
| 229) |
|
| Lindsay Plumbley |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank, Monton |
|
This is a far too big of a plant to have in this area, Monton is a supposed village and not an industrial estate.
With the amount of lorry's that will be on the road will it will no longer be a desirable place to live!
|
| 228) |
|
| Andrew Frith |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 20:03
There is no place for such a piece of industrial equipment within a residential environment, a rethink is needed.
|
| 227) |
|
| Catherine Frith |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 20:00
The inclusion of such a facility would be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of local residents. A residential estate is no place for this industrial eyesore.
|
| 226) |
|
| Anne Horan |
|
Street Name, Town: Walker road,Eccles |
|
There is enough polution around already.
|
| 225) |
|
| Louise Delaney |
|
Street Name, Town: Markland Hill, Bolton |
|
This should NOT be allowed to happen in such a lovely spot.
|
| 224) |
|
| Neil Shepherd |
|
Street Name, Town: Kilcoby Avenue, Swinton |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 17:00
This would be a disaster for the little village of Monton. It is already a cut through for a lot of motorists and if this was to go ahead the extra noise and added traffic would make the residents life a living nightmare.
A rethink is needed.
|
| 223) |
|
| Edwina Pointon |
|
Street Name, Town: Cartmel, Cumbria |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 16:54
It is ludicrous to suggest that an incinerator be built in a residential area. There are many more open spaces which would be far more suitable, such as at Trafford Park. Monton is a pretty village which is improving all the time. To send a huge number of lorries through the village and down residential streets is an appalling idea, from a safety point of view and from a health point of view.
|
| 222) |
|
| T Nowell |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 16:31
If this goes ahead,it will be an unmitigated disaster for Monton and the surrounding areas in so many ways.Totally inappropriate location for a proposed facility such as this.
|
| 221) |
|
| Gill Nowell |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 16:18
Right idea, WRONG LOCATION!!!
|
| 220) |
|
| Cllr Iain Lindley |
|
Street Name, Town: Valdene Drive, Walkden |
|
This development will have a huge detrimental effect on local residents in Monton, Winton, Eccles and Patricroft. I'm really pleased to see so many local people who care about their community submitting objections.
|
| 219) |
|
| Rebecca Byrom-Bent |
|
Street Name, Town: Chorlton, Manchester |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 15:58
I work in the area and the traffic is a nightmare as it is the last thing this little village needs is more traffic especially Lorries!
|
| 218) |
|
| Dan Davey |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 14:53
No to all plans for any dump/incinerator - whatever it may be called
|
| 217) |
|
| Sue Evans |
|
Street Name, Town: Sandbach, Cheshire |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 14:38
Why is it always necessary to squeeze such an eyesore into a beautiful little village and put people's health at risk.
Put your thinking caps on again and find an alternative and safer place for your incinerator.
|
| 216) |
|
| Sally Shepherd |
|
Street Name, Town: Kilcoby Avenue, Stinton |
|
Monton is a lovely picturesque village and would be totally spoilt by the waste incinerator/treatment plant.
|
| 215) |
|
| Stephen Alexander |
|
Street Name, Town: Sale, Cheshire |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 14:24
I don’t live in the area but sure as hell wouldn’t want this thing happening where I live – Please leave well alone! We don’t need this kind of thing in such a nice residential area.
|
| 214) |
|
| Sarah Kershaw |
|
Street Name, Town: Boothstown, Worsley |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 14:05
 Monton is a lovely area - please leave it alone!!
|
| 213) |
|
| Carole Brown |
|
Street Name, Town: corbel Way |
|
 I cannot believe that this project has got so far without any consultation with the residents of Monton. I fear for the heatlh and well being for the residents of Monton as the level of carbon monoxide emissions will be greatly increased from the HGV's and who knows what will be pumped out from the incinerator. We need to lobby our MP as well as signing this petition and I for one will be contacting Ian Stuart ASAP
|
| 212) |
|
| Julian Travis |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Road |
|
We dont need more polution and unsightlty buildings in the area! Theres plenty of space for things like that in the country side!
|
| 211) |
|
| Dean Rawlings-Brown |
|
Street Name, Town: Carlton Street, Monton |
|
I'm utterly disgusted that there's even thought of building this in such a lovely place - so close to where our children play. This monstrosoty brings nothing - there will be no gain to anyone - even the "eco" name is negated by the fact that thousands more lorry trips will be created to this area. Stop this now.
If it is proven to be necessary for this area then why not Trafford Park where it is not a residential area? No, no, no.
|
| 210) |
|
| Kate Pointon |
|
Street Name, Town: Carlton Street, Monton |
|
Monton is an up and coming area which even the BBC are recommending people relocating from London to Media City should consider. This plant will destroy any chances of continued improvement to this area and will ruin the beautiful village atmosphere that we get. How a proposal so close to residential areas has even been considered is beyond me. We need to rally as much support, including councillors & MPs, to stop this as opposition power does work. Get everyone you know to sign this and present it to not only our local government but No. 10 Downing Street too. I have seen the success of powerful & vocal opposition. We need to be in the press, local tv, council meetings, etc.
Please please everyone, let's try and stop this for our chidren's future.
|
| 209) |
|
| Lou Minshull |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens |
|
 Wednesday, 20. January 2010 10:15
Cannot understand the thinking behind this... Utter madness!
|
| 208) |
|
| J.J.Smith |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park....Monton |
|
 Tuesday, 19. January 2010 22:32
This disgusting monstrosity must be stopped at once. Toxic fumes, lorries and more toxic fumes, Stop it at once
|
| 207) |
|
| Anne Crichton |
|
Street Name, Town: Bradgreen Road, Monton |
|
The misleading title of 'Eco Park' sounds like an educational science park. This is a deliberate ploy to lull the community into a sense of 'green'security. Nothing further from the truth. Monton is a desirable place to live. To build a huge waste 'dump' on the banks of the historic Bridgewater Canal would put Monton's future as an up and coming residential area in jeopardy. The increase in traffic would add to existing problems, house values would fall and in spite of assurances how can we be sure of the safety of the processing methods. This area should be re-designated as residential.
|
| 206) |
|
| Lee Henderson |
|
Street Name, Town: Hartington road, winton |
|
Ridiculous idea on so many levels.
|
| 205) |
|
| Jacqueline Henderson |
|
Street Name, Town: Hartington road, Winton |
|
 No to the so called "Eco Plant".. Lets all fight to stop this happening for so many reasons.
|
| 204) |
|
| Chris Coeulle |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonfields Road, Monton |
|
No Thanks!
|
| 203) |
|
| thorley |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
it is to near peoples homes and walkways that people use for walking/running exercise with children
|
| 202) |
|
| Tim Collins |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
I attended the open meeting at The Queen's Arms Pub (Top House) and it would appear Hazel Blears is dead set against the idea. The local councilman on the other hand seemed very none commital which I read as him being in favour of it. There is no way this type of plant should be allowed near housing. Tell everyone you know to sign this petition.
|
| 201) |
|
| Deborah Major |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
Absolutely not!!! Cant believe that this council could seriously consider passing such a ridiculous misery inducing proposal. The traffic is bad enough at peak times without adding to the stress. Monton takes great pride in being a family community, what about the health risk to the future generation of this country. People spend a lot of their time (with no help from the council!!!) to make the area beautiful and aren't we supposed to be attracting widlife and visitors to the historic sights. Get a grip labour council you cant afford to keep the roads in a decent state without all this additional traffic. Think health not wealth there are plenty of derelict industrial sites more suitable!!!!!
|
| 200) |
|
| Liz Harris |
|
Street Name, Town: Ellesmere Park, Monton, |
|
I believe this facility is not properly thought out. The additional lorry traffic will cause congestion, pollution and road degradation.
The pollution from the plant is too close to residential areas and needs to be situated much further from villages and houses.
Planning permission for this site must be rejected
|
| 199) |
|
| Wilkinson Family |
|
Street Name, Town: Shackleton Street, Monton |
|
We say 'NO' to Green Lane Incinerator. We believe that this venture is totally inappropriate for the area! Access is already limited due to the narrowness of the road (Green Lane). If the lorries delivering the waste cannot gain immediate access, do they queue on Green Lane? The area is too small for this type of venture it should be based in the immediate area of Trafford Park where the majority of the waste will be coming from, as afterall all the waste is commercial. The health and safety aspects of living by this site is of paramount concern to us, irrespective of the 'quoted' minimal amount of fumes exhumed by the plant, what about if any of the plant breaks down and emmissions of noxious fumes escape.
|
| 198) |
|
| Sutherden Family |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 20:57
Beggars belief that it has actually got to this stage. Madness. There are so many reasons for this to not to be built.
|
| 197) |
|
| Katie Hammond |
|
Street Name, Town: Algernon Street, Monton |
|
Totally against this - 'eco park'? I don't think so. There's branding and there's branding  totally agree with others that this should not be placed here. Ok, the site looks a mess but surely there are better places to site this monstrosity that are not right next to a very nice residential area with greenspace, canals and woodlands within spitting distance. I think the way they are trying to 'sell' this is outrageous, an eco park it is not. I'm a landscape architect and have worked on eco parks on many occasions and I can tell you they do not contain incinerators and chimneys. How do we stop this from happening??? Will anyone listen to us?
|
| 196) |
|
| ray mozley |
|
Street Name, Town: taunton avenue winton |
|
it should not be allowed on health grounds alone.
|
| 195) |
|
| John |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 20:46
 Come on Monton, all of you need to stand up and say NO.
|
| 194) |
|
| Carol Smith |
|
Street Name, Town: Alfred Ave, Worsley |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 20:22
I am definitely against it!
|
| 193) |
|
| Tom Laffey |
|
Street Name, Town: Hartington Road, Wosrley |
|
This is such a bad idea. We are a residential area!
|
| 192) |
|
| jane sedgwick |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 16:46
on health grounds no thank you
|
| 191) |
|
| Julie Cox |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Rd, Monton |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 16:27
This is madness..Not here ..please.
|
| 190) |
|
| Matthew Cox |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Rd |
|
There must be other more suitable areas than the proposed site. With the canal, local woods and village green all being popular places for local residents, not to mention the amount of housing in the area, it makes no sense what so ever to carry on with this project at this location. Unless of course you want to deliberately ruin an area!
I agree that Lumbs Lane would make more sense or somewhere towards Trafford where there is already a large degree of industry.
|
| 189) |
|
| Paul Beacock |
|
Street Name, Town: Cawdor Street, Patricroft |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 16:02
This should not be allowed to happen! There is a school on Green Lane, many residential properties and a children's play area just off Green Lane. The hazards involved in this project are enormous - environmental, health, especially people with asthma or breathing problems, traffic congestion, vermin, lower values of private housing and many more. The areas affected are widespread. There are many more sites in Salford which could be used for this project, away from a residential area, and I believe there will be a lot of opposition to this 'eco park'.
Would any of the Councillors like it on their doorstep?
|
| 188) |
|
| Linda Calderwood |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 15:18
Thanks for the flyer put through my door. Let us not forget there are local elections shortly and all we can do is vote to ger John and his Merry Men out of office. There are enough environmental issues in this area without adding to them. I have e-mailed Hazel Blars, Ian Stewart and Councilloer Jane Murphy stating my views. Is it not possible to hold a public meeting, maybe in the Monton House Hotel, asking John Merry and other councillors to attend? I see they have already started demolishing the existing buildings on the Green Lane site. Does this mean it is a foregone conclusion that the 'eco park' will be a surefire decision?
|
| 187) |
|
| Antony S |
|
Street Name, Town: Greenwood, Ellesmere Park |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 14:07
Not in a residential area!
|
| 186) |
|
| Sophie Harari |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Road, Monton |
|
It is disgraceful to even think and consider putting a waste site in the middle of a residential area, let alone the repercussions it would cause by doing so.
|
| 185) |
|
| David Mather |
|
Street Name, Town: sandwich road,eccles |
|
Unfortunately Government policy supports this kind of development. However it should be sited where it will not harm the local environment. It is blatently obvious that Green Lane is in the middle of a large residential area.
Presumably the trucks visitng the site will be to large to go under the railway bridge which will mean all HGV traffic going round the mini islands at Monton.
Even if it were possible to go south down Green Lane that is also through a mainly residential area.
The plan also shows access onto Lansdowne Road which would lead to more HGV traffic on Lansdowne Road and through the centre of Monton.
Salford Council must put up a strong case to oppose this as in my experience it could be won on appeal.
|
| 184) |
|
| Liz Barnett |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
 Monday, 18. January 2010 09:27
This should not be allowed. Why can't it go next to the area next to the dump on Lumbs Lane.
|
| 183) |
|
| Lewis Pathak |
|
Street Name, Town: Lower Seedley Road, Salford |
|
Thanks, my awareness of the problems surrounding the building of this incinerator and any effects it may cause to the surrounding environment has been greatly increased. I would like to know that this makes a difference.
|
| 182) |
|
| Frank |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Sunday, 17. January 2010 22:22
NO to this plan. DUMP Labour
|
| 181) |
|
| Diane |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Sunday, 17. January 2010 22:19
A resounding NO to this Dump
|
| 180) |
|
| Gill family |
|
Street Name, Town: Cavendish Road, Monton |
|
this development will bring hgv traffic through Monton, noise, smells and vermin, not to mention a 55m high eyesore - to allow this in the middle of a residential area is complete madness.
|
| 179) |
|
| g mcgrath |
|
Street Name, Town: belmont st monton |
|
 Sunday, 17. January 2010 20:45
no no no i value my health and the health of my family,move it somewhere else why not build it on the land fill rubbish dump at warrington,and not near a residential area.
|
| 178) |
|
| Mike Vasey |
|
Street Name, Town: Addison Road, Irlam |
|
I'm afraid ladies and gentlemen of Monton your objections will be totally ignored by this Labour council.
We here on the boundary of Eccles/Irlam...which being the Crossfield Estate and the 'Margarine Estate' on the A57 towards Warrington voiced our objections to a 'Recycling Plant' being constructed directly on the A57 and directly opposite the Crossfield Estate.
Not one resident on the Crossfield Estate and the adjoining estate agreed to this proposal yet it still went ahead with the blessing of Salford City Council.
I personally challenged Councillor Merry in March 2009 to produce a single resident that was in favour of this scheme....I'm still waiting.
Needless to say the 'Recycling Plant' is well under way.
May I suggest to the good people of Monton...do what we here in Irlam are going to do...vote Labour OUT at the next elections in May
|
| 177) |
|
| Mark Palin |
|
Street Name, Town: Lansdowne Rd |
|
As a Monton resident I am completely opposed to the idea of this project. On my road the volume of industrial traffic is far too excessive for a residential street. HGV's constantly damage the road, drive at dangerous speeds, frequently send shock waves through my house when they pass and are obviously noisy and unwelcome. An additional 80 HGV's per day (as proposed by the project planners)and extra noise, air and refuse pollution is completely unacceptable. I sincerely hope the residents of Monton and Salford Council prevent this project from being realised
|
| 176) |
|
| Christine Bamforth |
|
Street Name, Town: The Spinney, Grindleton |
|
I used to live in Monton very close to the canal. There's a great social community there and I used to enjoy our garden parties, walks along the canal or sitting in the beer garden at the Barge Inn. I really think an incinerator would reduce the quality of outdoor life for the people living there, not to mention their house value, and would be equally unattractive to walkers & visitors to the area.
|
| 175) |
|
| jan phelan |
|
Street Name, Town: monton, eccles |
|
 Sunday, 17. January 2010 17:34
Should this plant be built the long term health risks for local residents is a major concern. The roads are inadequate in size and standard to accomodate the increased heavy lorry load that the plant would require to operate.
Paramount should be the health and safety of local residents and their children.
The track record of similar dumps and their compliance to environmental standards regarding emissions, commitment to promises made etc should be investigated and closely scrutinised.
|
| 174) |
|
| Stephanie White |
|
Street Name, Town: Quakerfields, Westhoughton |
|
This should not be allowed in a residential area.
|
| 173) |
|
| Sarah Barrett |
|
Street Name, Town: Chaise Meadow, Lymm |
|
Potentially devestating on so many levels! Don't let it happen! Monton was a fantastic place to grow up as it should continue to be!
|
| 172) |
|
| Jean Jee |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley |
|
This should not even have been a consideration in a densely populated area.How can our local council permit planning permission?
|
| 171) |
|
| Barbara B |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley, Manchester |
|
This should not even be considered.
|
| 170) |
|
| Alina Coyle |
|
Street Name, Town: Mirfield Drive, Monton |
|
 Sunday, 17. January 2010 10:10
Instead of re-generating the area from its industrial past we are now under the threat of this waste plant in the heart of a residential area. The pollution and extra traffic is a real concern. Surely this will affect everyone in the surrounding area, and the long term health risks cannot be predicted. This area of Canal Bank is currently being cleaned up to provide a better habitat for wildlife and for people to enjoy.
|
| 169) |
|
| Eileen |
|
Street Name, Town: Rochdale |
|
 Sunday, 17. January 2010 09:33
far too close to a residential area
|
| 168) |
|
| Christine Bentley |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonfields Road |
|
 Saturday, 16. January 2010 17:45
I was shocked to read about the advanced plans for a waste management plant so close to residential housing and the Bridgewater Canal which is earmarked for improvement as a tourist/leisure facilityjavascript:emoticon('  ').How can that happen with a huge waste dump nearby? Why can't the dump be located on industrial land away from residential housing and far from the already congested roads of Monton Winton & Worsley,also plagued by M60 Jct.13 traffic. Our roads are already full of potholes, more heavy vehicles will make matters worse. I cannot imagine whose brainwave this was - just adds to the growing list of things to complain about living under Labour.
|
| 167) |
|
| Ann Ayres |
|
Street Name, Town: Park Road, Eccles |
|
I believe this site was due for development of apartments. An incinerator will create high volumes of heavy traffic, which I believe may be in operation 24 hours a day. This will disrupt residents peace and quiet. Also, can that road take the burden of the extra traffic day and night. There will be polution from the site. It's unacceptable in a residential area. Why has the developer changed from building apartments to an industrial use, is it due to the property slump and saturation of the property market with apartments? I say a big fat NO!
|
| 166) |
|
| Julie Seymour |
|
Street Name, Town: Nelson Street, Eccles |
|
As a resident of Patricroft this recycling plant will affect not only Monton but the adjoining districts as the pollution will be blown far and wide across the area. I cannot believe that just because the land is designated for industrial use that the council, in good conscience, would prefer this idea to the previous one of having environmentally friendly, green housing on this site - just change the bloody ruling and allow the housing!!!! - I fear the council may live to regret this decision when the price of dealing with the increased rate of respiratory infections and diseases far outstrips the profit from the plant they are proposing to build.
|
| 165) |
|
| phil columbine |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
can't believe what i read. if this actually happens it proves that money is actually more important than people
|
| 164) |
|
| Luann Robinson |
|
Street Name, Town: corbel way, monton |
|
 Saturday, 16. January 2010 13:42
Really concerned about this as we have two small babies and the risks to health are scary
|
| 163) |
|
| sue matin |
|
Street Name, Town: brentwood drive monton |
|
This should not be allowed in a residential area.
|
| 162) |
|
| martin manning |
|
Street Name, Town: Grange Drive |
|
 Ludicrous, air quality bad enough without loading it with dioxins!
|
| 161) |
|
| Sue Wray |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens, Monton |
|
This is a residential area. How has this project been allowed to get to this stage.
|
| 160) |
|
| E Breukers |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
 Friday, 15. January 2010 18:50
 Im shocked that this is even being considered. This is in a residential area and it would not be fair for the local and wider community!!
|
| 159) |
|
| Brenton Breukers |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Road, Monton |
|
 Friday, 15. January 2010 18:46
This clearly should never be built in a residential area!
|
| 158) |
|
| T Clark |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea, Eccles |
|
 Friday, 15. January 2010 17:53
Plenty of empty spaces in Trafford Park or perhaps even Carrington Business Park.
KEEP SAYING NO, NO, NO AS LOUD AS YOU CAN.
|
| 157) |
|
| Debbie Kelly |
|
Street Name, Town: Westminster Road eccles |
|
 Friday, 15. January 2010 16:29
This dump should not be allowed anywhere near residential areas!
|
| 156) |
|
| julie mather |
|
Street Name, Town: sandwich road ellesmere park |
|
this should not be allowed in a residential area.
|
| 155) |
|
| Dianne Butler |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonfields Rd Monton |
|
 this incinerator should not be allowed anywhere near a residential area
|
| 154) |
|
| Ged |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea, Patricroft |
|
 Thursday, 14. January 2010 20:50
How can anyone consider building such a recycling plant in the middle of a residential area?
|
| 153) |
|
| Alison |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea, Patricroft |
|
 Thursday, 14. January 2010 20:46
Who dreams up these ideas? They obviously live nowhere near this area. How can these planners even consider this sort of 'recycling' (loosely termed) anywhere near such a picturesque suburban area, are they completely out of their minds? We say a positive and definite NO to this proposal.
|
| 152) |
|
| P Wylde |
|
Street Name, Town: Shackleton Street, Monton |
|
 Thursday, 14. January 2010 20:14
It is a disgrace that this has even been considered seen as though the new housing estate was knocked back - at least that wouldn't have impacted our lives as much as this so-called eco park if it comes! Say NO to these plans and keep Monton as it is!!
|
| 151) |
|
| p ridge |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
This eco dump should never even been considered .It took us 3 years to get a kids park/playground.Would the proposers of this dump let there kids play here when its up and running.A couple of nice trees on the plans doesnt mean its friendly .Take your plans else where
|
| 150) |
|
| N Clark |
|
Street Name, Town: Patricroft |
|
 Thursday, 14. January 2010 18:29
This is a residential area, so who's getting the back hander..? similar to when Irwell Park school was so strongly opposed, but planning went through regardless!!!I understand that processing will continue 24 hours a day, do the local council not think we have enough noise pollution to put up with, what with the motorway and all. Green Lane is a traffic rat run already, with additioinal Pelecan crossings been installed recently. HGV's every 7.5 minutes will only exacerbate the problem.
Totally against!!! Call me a Nimby but I value my health thank you!!!
|
| 149) |
|
| read this |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Thursday, 14. January 2010 18:24
read this.. bad
http://www.no-burn.org/article.php?list=type&type=132
|
| 148) |
|
| Paul Watson |
|
Street Name, Town: Patricroft |
|
Its obvious Salford Council has no regards for the health of its people with this hair brained scheme its time for a change in Salford get the Labour idiots out at the next council elections.Also i have voted labour for 34 years this council dont listen to public opinion.
|
| 147) |
|
| Alexa Mchugh |
|
Street Name, Town: Royton |
|
I am voting against the Green lane incinerator the whole idea stinks, please build far far away from residential areas, this will also save the areas unwanted carbon footprints which we are supposed to as a whole world be decreasing its already high rate of CO2!!
|
| 146) |
|
| Jan Stansfield |
|
Street Name, Town: stretford manchester |
|
 Thursday, 14. January 2010 15:04
isn't there enough pollution in our lives without adding more, this is so close to a childrens play area and housing with families, all those big trucks and the disgusting smells. no thanks
|
| 145) |
|
| Tommt Cassidy |
|
Street Name, Town: Hawthorn Ave, Monton |
|
We do not need this plant or the traffice it will bring, we already have three sets of pelican lights on Monton Road because the traffic is so heavy!!
|
| 144) |
|
| Cynthia Taylor |
|
Street Name, Town: Saddlecote,Barton Rd,Worsley |
|
 Thursday, 14. January 2010 11:05
I was shocked to read about the advanced plans for a waste management plant so close to residential housing and the Bridgewater Canal which is earmarked for improvement as a tourist/leisure facility.How can that happen with a huge waste dump nearby? Why can't the dump be located on industrial land away from residential housing and far from the already congested roads of Monton Winton & Worsley,also plagued by M60 Jct.13 traffic.
|
| 143) |
|
| J Davies |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
NO NO NO!!!!
|
| 142) |
|
| Andrew C |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Road, Monton. |
|
I get it. 'Council wont let us build houses so we will come up with the worst possible alternative. That'll get the locals whipped up and we may get Residential consent after all!!'
Thanks, but no thanks.
Council.....lets not have an Ice Rink for a few years, spend the cash on buying this site and then put a mixed use resi/light industrial scheme on the site. Do something useful for once!
|
| 141) |
|
| yvonne miller |
|
Street Name, Town: tyldesley |
|
What a ridiculous idea? Building an incinerator close to primary schools and a special school? Does kids health not matter anymore?
|
| 140) |
|
| Zoe Price |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank |
|
I was horrified to hear that an incinerator was to be build just 200 yards away from my house. The health risks involved in building such a plant in a residential area are enormous. There is of course the traffic issue but I feel the risk the health of the local people is the bigger issue - the Eastcroft cough!! This is not somewhere to raise a young family and the chance of ever being able to sell our house once this place is built is low if at all possible.
|
| 139) |
|
| mark little |
|
Street Name, Town: meadowfields, hindley green |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 23:08
why spoil such a lovely area when there is an industrial estate down the road!
|
| 138) |
|
| John Hosie |
|
Street Name, Town: Woodford Avenue |
|
This is absolutely disgraceful. This is in an area very close too a lot of residential estates. The emmited particulates will be harmful no matter what assurances we are given. I'snt it enough that we in this area have to suffer pollution from the motorways and local Chemical works?
No doubt our wonderful supportive council will object to this proposal in the strongest possible terms.
|
| 137) |
|
| M Mackay |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 20:38
I am shocked to hear of the plans to build this site in the middle of a residential area which does not have the appropriate access to deal with the heavy traffic involved. This will be damaging to our health, finances and standard of living. Should this go ahead it will damage the area for all. (I'm also curious to know how this fits in with the regeneration of the Bridgewater Canal.... Doesn't seem like a pleasant addition to me.)
|
| 136) |
|
| Charles Blackwell |
|
Street Name, Town: Grange Drive, Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 20:25
This is just not right for a residential area like Monton - surely Trafford Park or Knowsley Industrial Estate make much more sensible options which won't have such a negative impact on the local community.
|
| 135) |
|
| Mark Rooney |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonfields Road. Monton |
|
Can't believe that the proposal got this far...!
Keep Monton Clean & Green...!
|
| 134) |
|
| carol baines |
|
Street Name, Town: winton |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 18:20
no no no no no no no no!
|
| 133) |
|
| janette thomas |
|
Street Name, Town: weymouth road |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 17:36
my little girl goes to school in monton , this is a DISGRACE!
|
| 132) |
|
| dawn ditchett |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 17:36
No NO NO NO
|
| 131) |
|
| sue walmsley |
|
Street Name, Town: monton green |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 17:33
not near my house !
|
| 130) |
|
| jack thomas |
|
Street Name, Town: grange drive monton. |
|
i am totally against the idea of a incinerator plant being constructed in monton , i understand the situation regarding refuge disposal , however, i disagree with constructing it in a highly populated area. Surely a alternative site could be found , in a less populated area without disrupting a community.
|
| 129) |
|
| loretta fox |
|
Street Name, Town: grange drive, monton |
|
This is appalling news and must be stopped. There are plenty of unoccupied industrial areas on the outskirts of the city that would possibly be more suitable for an incinerator, why would they want to put it into a large residential area? It would be an outrage for all residents in the vicinity to live with this on their door step.
|
| 128) |
|
| JAMES BANNER. |
|
Street Name, Town: 5 JAMES NASMYTH WAY MONTON |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 14:09
THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THE GREEN LANE INCINERATER WILL RESULT IN AN INCREASE OF THE ALREADY HIGH INCIDENCE OF BRONCHIAL PROBLEMS OF PEOPLE LIVING IN THIS AREA.IF THE PROJECT IS FINALLY PASSED TO PROCEED THE FIRST STEP MUST BE TO INVOLVE HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE IN THE DESIGN OF THE AIR CLEANSING SYSTEM PRIOR TO DISCHARGE INTO THE ATMOSPHERE.
|
| 127) |
|
| B Redford |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 12:43
 Why is this scheme even being considered by the council? To build this health/noise hazzard, not to mention eye sore, 60 meters from housing beggars belief.
|
| 126) |
|
| A Simpson |
|
Street Name, Town: Park Road, Monton |
|
I am totally against the 'eco' park being sited in Monton. There are pleny of areas in trafford park where it could be built
|
| 125) |
|
| Jason Smith |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 13. January 2010 11:44
No thanks
|
| 124) |
|
| john matthew thompson |
|
Street Name, Town: monton green, eccles M309LN |
|
siting this facility in a highly populated residential area shows an amazing lack of intelligence and/or a total disregard for the public.
|
| 123) |
|
| Keri |
|
Street Name, Town: Clarendon Crescent, Eccles |
|
Totally Against
|
| 122) |
|
| Vivien Mills |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 No thank you is all, I am appalled and this is the first I have heard of it.
|
| 121) |
|
| Dan Griffith |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
As a Canal Bank resident I have great concern regarding the potential rise in the volume of traffic on a road which is already showing signs of cracking. The idea of installing an industrial recycling/rubbish dump in a residential area is sheer madness. The risk of pollution is extremely high. For the sake of the future generation this must be prevented.
|
| 120) |
|
| Jean Wild |
|
Street Name, Town: Patricroft |
|
 Tuesday, 12. January 2010 15:29
The proposal to site this so-called 'Eco Dump' on Green Lane is absolute madness. Salford Council must be suffering from Collective Stupidity.
|
| 119) |
|
| Carl Lancaster |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
With a young family in a relatively recently purchased house, less that 100 meters from the proposed site, this is the worst thing that could happen to every resident within the surrounding area. There are environmental, financial and health issues that far overide any potential benefits for this proposed plan. We have a moral obligation to the residents of Monton and the other areas affected by this proposed plan to fight this ridiculous submission.
|
| 118) |
|
| Miss Margaret Newlove |
|
Street Name, Town: Dorchester Road Swinton |
|
I work on James Nasmyth Business Park
which is ajacent to the proposed site. I do not like the idea of waste spuring out into the atmosphere as I only live 2 Miles away.
|
| 117) |
|
| Rachel Whincup |
|
Street Name, Town: 5 James Nasmyth way Green lane |
|
 I HAVE TO WORK NEXT TO THIS
|
| 116) |
|
| Ann Christie |
|
Street Name, Town: Hopefold Drive, Walkden |
|
This is an extremely densely populated residential area - the installation would be better suited in Trafford Park where road access is aleady well establisehd
|
| 115) |
|
| stephen candlish |
|
Street Name, Town: salford |
|
its a disgrace lobby your local mps/councillors,even crocodile tears blears,she will jump on a situation like this to save her own skin,remember the u turn re maternity facilities at hope,as a previous post said this should be built in a true industrial location,ie trafford park,but i do believe that underlying forces put through these schemes who profits?
|
| 114) |
|
| L Mason |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 11. January 2010 21:46
This is a residential area and the dump should not be allowed so close to homes and schools.
No to the ecodump.
|
| 113) |
|
| Matthew Ashford |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Monday, 11. January 2010 21:09
This will damage our village, our people and house prices will drop like a stone. No to the dump.
|
| 112) |
|
| Kevin Entwistle |
|
Street Name, Town: Nansen Ave, monton |
|
No to the so called "Eco Plant".. Lets all fight to stop this happening for so many reasons
|
| 111) |
|
| Trevor Gibson |
|
Street Name, Town: Nansen Avenue |
|
Well this is about right for Salford Council obviously someone is on the back hander for this one!! Where do the MP's live? Not near this brain storm idea and can you see this happening in Worsley NO nor can I. This area is said to be set aside for industrial area so no houses can be built! Worsley rd Swinton had a mill! Now houses, Moorside rd had a Mill!Now houses, Worsley Green had an industrial site next to the canal! Now has houses!!!!!!!! enough said. Good Old Labour Thanks For Nothing
|
| 110) |
|
| L Denison |
|
Street Name, Town: Nansen Ave, Monton |
|
I am totally opposed to the supposed 'ECO park' and fear for the health of all in Monton
.
Why was the ECO housing estate that
was originally planned scrapped - it
doesn't make sense for something like this to be built so close to residential areas IT IS A DISGRACE and we need to fight against this
|
| 109) |
|
| Joe Lang |
|
Street Name, Town: Nansen Avenue Monton |
|
 Monday, 11. January 2010 19:47
Has a new tip not just been done on lumns lane in salford? Why not put the so called "ECO-PARK" there.
|
| 108) |
|
| lesley halliwell |
|
Street Name, Town: algernon street |
|
 Monday, 11. January 2010 17:04
NO WE DO NOT WANT IT HERE.
|
| 107) |
|
| billy joseph downing |
|
Street Name, Town: winton |
|
 Monday, 11. January 2010 17:00
no to rubish tip!!!
|
| 106) |
|
| john halliwell |
|
Street Name, Town: algernon street |
|
 Monday, 11. January 2010 16:57
no no no to the tip....
|
| 105) |
|
| Gary Tumulty |
|
Street Name, Town: Salford |
|
NO THANK YOU
|
| 104) |
|
| Kevin Payne |
|
Street Name, Town: Off Montonfields, Monton |
|
Have come to conclusion that the only thing ECO is the recycled output. Might well be needed, but the location is wrong - it should be in a large heavy industrial area and not within a light indust / residential area. And don't forget those lorries - they're a greater risk than the plant itself!
|
| 103) |
|
| Steve |
|
Street Name, Town: Patricroft |
|
 Sunday, 10. January 2010 21:17
Absolutely should not happen for all the reasons said previously!
Where are Salford Council now? Probably making a few quid out of it i bet?!
They had a big drive as a local authority for all of us to get healthy...oh, yes and put a dump in the heart of Salford!
Brilliant!
|
| 102) |
|
| Michelle Flynn |
|
Street Name, Town: Worsley |
|
 Sunday, 10. January 2010 20:46
Green Lane is too much of a densely populated area for an eco park. It couldn't take the traffic or pollution.
|
| 101) |
|
| Claire Fearnehough |
|
Street Name, Town: westwood crescent |
|
 Sunday, 10. January 2010 20:09
This needs to be stopped, the polition would be really bad there is so many houses and schools near by it's just ridiculous that they are planning this here.
The traffis round there aswell would be arrendous!
claire fearnehough:
excuse my spelling mistakes :)
|
|
| 100) |
|
| lee smith |
|
Street Name, Town: cromwell road |
|
think this is a bad idea in such a highly populated residantial area and with so many primary schools close by
|
| 99) |
|
| Julie |
|
Street Name, Town: Clifton Avenue, Monton |
|
Theres already enough polution in the air with Trafford Park and the motorway near. A site like this should be in an industrial area not a residential one.
|
| 98) |
|
| Adrian Wilson |
|
Street Name, Town: Marsden Street, Monton |
|
With miles of empty land along the A57 between Eccles & the M6, why next to a populated area?
|
| 97) |
|
| Dawn Collins |
|
Street Name, Town: Catherine Street, Eccles |
|
Putting our children at risk is digusting, no excuse for it, this needs to be stopped.
|
| 96) |
|
| Julie |
|
Street Name, Town: Winton |
|
 Saturday, 9. January 2010 20:20
Absolutely NOT! Total madness. Found this info on Facebook - are they trying to keep this quiet?
|
| 95) |
|
| Dan Flynn |
|
Street Name, Town: roe green |
|
Eco Park my ****
|
| 94) |
|
| Huw Buckley |
|
Street Name, Town: Cromwell Road, Eccles. |
|
Hi, I have been speaking to Ian Stewart MP and Cllr John Mullen, and they are both supportive of our stand against this "Eco Park", and they would be insterested in getting involved.
|
| 93) |
|
| Antony Yates |
|
Street Name, Town: Franklin St. Eccles |
|
I am the Conservative party candidate for the Barton ward. I attended the meeting at the Queens arms, and was glad to see such a turn out. Like many there I have not received any literature concerning the development, and I am annoyed that this initial stage is going through without the proper full public awareness. As many at the meeting pointed out, putting this important information in with ‘Life in Salford’ doesn’t work as no one reads it.
Hopefully enough letters will be received in the next week to push the deadline back.
|
| 92) |
|
| John Wild |
|
Street Name, Town: Patricroft |
|
 Saturday, 9. January 2010 14:46
It would be a huge mistake to build this on Green Lane, as it would be too close to surrounding residential areas. This should be sited within a large industrial area (e.g. Trafford Park ).
|
| 91) |
|
| jason wilson |
|
Street Name, Town: watson st eccles patricroft |
|
I have sent an email to ian stewart regarding this dump, and he said he would be happy to help the local people get there voice noticed so may be we should sort a meeting with him and get the ball rolling.
|
| 90) |
|
| Pat Heatley |
|
Street Name, Town: belgrave cres. monton eccles |
|
Just writing the words 'eco park' is done to foolus into thinking it will be something positive,and good for the environment. That's a load of eyewash. We must not allow this to be built. Fight it all the way.
|
| 89) |
|
| Joanne Derbyshire |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
 Friday, 8. January 2010 19:15
Something like this does not belong in a residential area. This must be stopped!
|
| 88) |
|
| Marion El-Qasem |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
Monton is a desirable residential area which will be spoilt by the building of an environmentally unacceptable plant. I thought the aim was to improve residential areas not to detract from them.
|
| 87) |
|
| paul griffin |
|
Street Name, Town: manchester |
|
i feel ssorry for the company that bought this land to redevelop the site from industrial to residential,but salford council would not allow this and sadly they are trying to find a solution to use the land.
i totally agree with the comments i have read and remember a simular situation in trafford park some years ago.the local green party and local residents campained and won! with local people and mp's getting together on this it can be defeted like last time,the toxins and unknown waste that will come from this site will frieghten you.
this must be stopped? speak to your local councilor.
|
| 86) |
|
| Lee Middleton |
|
Street Name, Town: Trafford Road, Eccles. |
|
I totally oppose the idea of having this in a residential area. If it is to be in the local surrounding area then the have it in Trafford Park where it will not affect local residents and have an affect on lowering house prices which are bad enough as it is.
|
| 85) |
|
| zoe lee |
|
Street Name, Town: sesame gardens, Irlam |
|
NOT NEEDED, NOT WANTED!!
My son already has autism and if this proposal goes ahead i have to run the risk of him getting asthma or even worse cancer! NO WAY!! Get lost we pay enough council tax, please let us LIVE!
|
| 84) |
|
| Matthew Kirkham |
|
Street Name, Town: Alfred Street, Monton |
|
 Thursday, 7. January 2010 23:39
It is unreasonable to situate a recycling/incinerator plant in a residential area when there are an abundance of other far more suitable sites available.
Surely the Council have a duty of care to the public?
|
| 83) |
|
| Nicola Barlow |
|
Street Name, Town: Alfred Street, Eccles |
|
 Thursday, 7. January 2010 23:32
I object to the incinerator at Green Lane Monton as it is too close to a residential area. I am concerned about the quality of air and also the effect on house prices.
The Eco-Park should be built in a non-residential area.
|
| 82) |
|
| Mark Armstrong |
|
Street Name, Town: Irlam |
|
yet another sign of salford council selling anything to anyone just to make some money, these people have no consideration of the impact on local residents health and welfare as long as they get some cash in the coffers "or their own back pockets maybe".
Just say no as they really dont care about you!!
|
| 81) |
|
| Clare |
|
Street Name, Town: Salford |
|
Even though I dont live directly in monton, I think this is disgusting to even think about building in such a residential area. Why not opposite Across, or in Trafford park, thats what its there for!! Transform the old shackleton site to being an area for families to go to, and enjoy.
|
| 80) |
|
| Kyla Ankers |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank, Eccles |
|
I am totally against this proposal and agree it can be sited at Trafford Park or even on the vast area of land for sale at the Acros site.
Change the use of this land and give this land to a housing developer to build much needed affordable homes for teachers, nurses and others who cannot get a foot on the property ladder.
|
| 79) |
|
| The Burns Family |
|
Street Name, Town: Tyersall Close |
|
No - we have the childrens future to think about. Stop it now!
|
| 78) |
|
| Dortothy |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
 Thursday, 7. January 2010 16:22
The prefix "eco" is somewhat of a misnomer if the proposal to site this plant close to human habitation and recreation goes ahead.
We are all part of the ecology of this planet of ours, and risking the health of we humans is unjustifiable in the extreme when Trafford Park could absorb this dump and hardly even notice it.
|
| 77) |
|
| The Shaw Family |
|
Street Name, Town: Apperley Grange, Monton |
|
 Thursday, 7. January 2010 16:04
This has got to be stopped and quick!! It's the last thing Monton Village needs. Please all sign the petition and let's all stand united!
|
| 76) |
|
| carol |
|
Street Name, Town: salford |
|
No this does NOT sound good, why can't a more secluded site be found for this
|
| 75) |
|
| andrew mckenzie |
|
Street Name, Town: somerset road |
|
We dont want the pollution here in eccles.shame on you salford council...
|
| 74) |
|
| patricia murphy |
|
Street Name, Town: cavendish road, eccles m30 9ee |
|
this is too close to a heavily built up area.
|
| 73) |
|
| kevin |
|
Street Name, Town: 20 montondale |
|
No thank you!!!!
|
| 72) |
|
| Andrew |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Ave, Eccles, Salford |
|
 Wednesday, 6. January 2010 17:31
Too near to schools and residential.
|
| 71) |
|
| Rick |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Wednesday, 6. January 2010 09:32
They wouldn't put it in the centre of Manchester so why put it in the centre of Eccles. Put it in the centre of Trafford Park where there is a built up industrial park with plenty of smells.
|
| 70) |
|
| Paula gibson |
|
Street Name, Town: 222 Monton Road |
|
|
| 69) |
|
| Anthony Nolan |
|
Street Name, Town: Green Lane |
|
 With all the traffic problems we have in this area already why would we need to bring in even more heavy loads?!? A residential area should never even be considered for such a site.... RIDICULOUS!!!!
|
| 68) |
|
| Lyndsey Hulme |
|
Street Name, Town: Green Lane |
|
 Totally disgusted about this ridiculous proposal!
Clearly the proposer for this is not local-infact-they are probably as far removed from the area as you could get!
|
| 67) |
|
| Matt Lees |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens |
|
 Tuesday, 5. January 2010 19:40
I would have thought Trafford Park would have been a better place for this- there seems a lot of unanswered questions on health and standard of living implications as well.
|
| 66) |
|
| A Dapoto |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 5. January 2010 16:43
Why spoil the lovely village of Monton Choose somewhere else in a non-residential area for this "eco-park"
|
| 65) |
|
| Andrea |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 5. January 2010 16:41
Very short-sighted for this to be built in a residential area. On the one hand there are plans for the Monton hub to be a “green lung” according to the Bridgewater Canal Corridor plan yet this is planned in the same area…
Surely it would be more logical for it to be built in Trafford Park?
|
| 64) |
|
| Leah Bennison |
|
Street Name, Town: Parrin Lane, Monton |
|
If the proposal does go ahead, I for one will be moving out of the area. Salford is doing so well at regenerating and rebuilding it's reputation and this will just undo all the hard work.
|
| 63) |
|
| M.Dean |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton Green |
|
 Monday, 4. January 2010 21:06
How could this ever be considered in such a built up residential area. With all the efforts of the residents in the area to improve the community, this will undo all the hard work. The area would only be known for this negative and not all the positive aspects of this area. The disadvantages far outweigh the stupid excuses for advantages.
|
| 62) |
|
| lisa van damms |
|
Street Name, Town: monton |
|
i agree with other comments that this type of plant should not be built in a residential area
|
| 61) |
|
| Una Cassidy |
|
Street Name, Town: Hawthorn Ave, Monton |
|
Monton will struggle to maintain it's village image with an incinerator and all the heavy transport associated with it.
|
| 60) |
|
| Steve Ankers |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
Lets fight tooth and nail to stop this, all this pollution plus the extra traffic all adjacent to schools playgrounds etc. What was wrong with the original idea for ECO housing any way.
Write to your MP too !!!!!
|
| 59) |
|
| Matt Sweet |
|
Street Name, Town: Vincent Avenue, Monton |
|
This type of plant has been refused planning permission in multiple other residential areas owing to the potential dangers caused by emmissions.
This simply cannot be allowed to be built here, or anywhere else near a residential area.
|
| 58) |
|
| Steve Murphy |
|
Street Name, Town: Mirfield Drive, Monton |
|
Quite frankly, unbelievable. How could any public body believe that this is a good idea, particularly as Monton is seemingly on the up and looking forward to the boost that the BBC relocation will bring.
|
| 57) |
|
| Thomas McGarva |
|
Street Name, Town: Pine Grove, Monton |
|
 Monday, 4. January 2010 01:26
It's just an absolutely terrible idea and whoever had it should be removed from their position of authority immediately!!
"I know, let's ruin a really nice area with a horrible stench and toxic fumes."
Nice one.
Quick, quick....let me book my child into one of Monton's nurserys or schools because I really want them to breathe in a ridiculous amount of crap as soon as possible please!
Seriously; is stupidity contagious? If so, the person(s) who suggeted the incinerator should be removed from society by men in bio-suits and scrubbed with 'anti-fool' soap for the safety of the general public.
|
| 56) |
|
| Vicki Johnson |
|
Street Name, Town: Algernon Street, Monton, |
|
I can't even believe this is being considered -I am totally opposed and fear for the health and wellbeing of all Monton residents especially the children.
|
| 55) |
|
| mr & mr floyd |
|
Street Name, Town: lulworth road winton eccles |
|
another great scheme by salford council that has not really been thought through!! this is something that we do not want in a residential area. all the arguments about bringing employment into the area do not wash either. it just displaces jobs not creates more. i oppose this decision
|
| 54) |
|
| S Sloan |
|
Street Name, Town: Montonmill Gardens |
|
 Sunday, 3. January 2010 15:44
What a ridiculous location for this. I am totally opposed to this.
|
| 53) |
|
| KATE COOK |
|
Street Name, Town: LORNE ST., CHESTER |
|
WE HAVE A VOICE WHICH WE MUST USE
|
| 52) |
|
| Jodie Booth |
|
Street Name, Town: Mirfield Drive |
|
 Sunday, 3. January 2010 13:07
Totally against this proposal.
|
| 51) |
|
| kathryn |
|
Street Name, Town: eccles |
|
 Saturday, 2. January 2010 21:04
this up the road from green lane would not agree with this planning going a head...........
|
| 50) |
|
| G. Corrgan |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Saturday, 2. January 2010 18:41
The health effects of air pollution imperil human lives. This fact is well-documented.
|
| 49) |
|
| Philip Austin |
|
Street Name, Town: The Lighthouse, Monton |
|
Apart from smells, traffic, etc whose waste will it be treating? Trafford Park is a much more logical site.
|
| 48) |
|
| Janice Green |
|
Street Name, Town: The Lighthouse, Monton |
|
I do not want an incinerator in a residential area. What about Trafford Park, better access etc. Don't want disgusting lorries passing my door
|
| 47) |
|
| wendy knowles |
|
Street Name, Town: marsden street |
|
put it somewhere else
|
| 46) |
|
| Louise Bridge |
|
Street Name, Town: Aldford Grove Bolton |
|
I don't think its a good idea to have an incinerator in a residential area. I wouldn't like it near my house nd don't want it for my friends either
|
| 45) |
|
| Gregory Daniel |
|
Street Name, Town: Rocky Lane, Monton |
|
Upwind of that for the rest of my days? No thanks!
|
| 44) |
|
| Kim |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank Monton |
|
 Friday, 1. January 2010 20:41
No I don't want fumes and an Incinerator in Monton. There are plenty of other places to put one were there isn't any housing.
|
| 43) |
|
| Lee Curry |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
Signed.
|
| 42) |
|
| Jayne Doherty |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Friday, 1. January 2010 16:51
 Its a big no from me! I've got asthma!
|
| 41) |
|
| Simon |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Friday, 1. January 2010 12:15
How about putting it next to Hazel Blears house and let's see how far that proposal gets!!!
|
| 40) |
|
| r smith |
|
Street Name, Town: winton eccles |
|
no thanks dont want to breathe all them fumes thanks but no thanks
|
| 39) |
|
| Andy Hopwood |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
 Friday, 1. January 2010 10:28
Definatly NO!!!!!!
|
| 38) |
|
| leanne knowles |
|
Street Name, Town: marsden street |
|
no thank you
|
| 37) |
|
| ann knowles |
|
Street Name, Town: marsden street |
|
hell no!!!!!!!!!1
|
| 36) |
|
| scott kennedy |
|
Street Name, Town: marsden street |
|
no thanks
|
| 35) |
|
| tracy smith |
|
Street Name, Town: monton green |
|
no fumes got asthmatic children plus me
|
| 34) |
|
| Robert Curry |
|
Street Name, Town: Charlton Ave, Eccles |
|
signed
|
| 33) |
|
| june williams |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank Monton |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 19:12
No definately not! it should not be near any housing whatsoever
|
| 32) |
|
| S Tindell |
|
Street Name, Town: Alfred St |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 18:51
I am at a loss as to why Monton should be chosen as a good place for an incinerator - I suspect the people who have discussed this and applied for licence are patting themselves on the back for this clever choice - as I also suspect they do not live in Monton and breathe this local air. As a long term resident of Monton I am totally against this porposal. Why should myself amd my family have to put up with foul smells, rodents, more traffic, heavy lorries ruining already broken roads making matters worse. I would also be concerned with property values in the area taking a further downturn. I feel there are far more suitable areas for this incinerator to be placed - NOT IN MONTON or any other residential area - TRY OUT OF TOWN!
|
| 31) |
|
| Diane bartlett |
|
Street Name, Town: nelson street |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 18:31
signed
|
| 30) |
|
| E.Bannerman |
|
Street Name, Town: oak ave,manchester |
|
Keep my friends street nice people!
|
| 29) |
|
| Anthony Ratcliffe |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
WE DO NOT WANT OR NEED THIS.
|
| 28) |
|
| Colin Powell |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 17:31
A residential area is NOT the place for an incinerator such as this!
|
| 27) |
|
| Chris |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 17:16
The whole idea is a disgrace.
|
| 26) |
|
| Gary Flannigan |
|
Street Name, Town: Bradford road, Manchester |
|
No Thanx....
|
| 25) |
|
| Emma Carpenter |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton, Manchester |
|
I would like it to be known that I am against the incinerator on Green Lane. This is not a suitable area for toxic gases and increases to transportation, there are plenty of places in industrial areas that could accommodate the so called Eco Park. Our roads are already gridlocked and full of pot holes we do not need more traffic and we do not need any more toxic fumes pumped into the local residentail community!
|
| 24) |
|
| rachael |
|
Street Name, Town: alfred st |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 16:55
i am against the incinerator on Green Lane
|
| 23) |
|
| Jasmin Cooper |
|
Street Name, Town: Vincent Avenue, Monton |
|
To whom it may concern,
By building an incinerator, unnecessary greenhouse gases as well as toxic fumes will be produced and released into the atmosphere. Also, an incinerator consumes mass amounts of electricity.
However, the incinerator would provide a alternative method for disposing of waste from landfill sites, and would completely dispose of the waste. Also, some may argue that by incinerating the waste, carbon trapped in the waste would be released back into the atmosphere, so would contribute towards the carbon cycle.
The overall impact of the incinerator on Green Lane would be huge, both on the environment and nearby resident. The incinerator as it is for waste disposal would attract vermin such as rats, which could further infest the incinerator building or local houses, as well as producing a foul smell. So in conclusion, the building of a incinerator on Green Lane would not be a wise decision.
|
| 22) |
|
| Aileen Waugh |
|
Street Name, Town: Maple Avenue |
|
STOP WASTING TIME AND MONEY IN PLANNING TO BUILD IN THIS AREA, YOU ALREADY KNOW THE HEALTH DETERIORATION DUE TO THE EXISTING BAD ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS....MOTORWAY FUMES CAUSE GLUE EAR AND ASTHMA HERE ALREADY.. YOU ALREADY KNOW THE LEGAL POLICY ON HUMAN RIGHTS, WE ARE ALL ENTITLED TO BREATH IN CLEAN AIR....incinerators cause filthy air and ill health....everyone knows this..STOP FOR EVER ANY PLANS TO BUILD NEAR, IN OR AROUND WHERE PEOPLE HAVE TO LIVE,THANK YOU .
|
| 21) |
|
| Nicola Mannion |
|
Street Name, Town: Francis St, Monton |
|
I would like it to be noted that I am against the incinerator on Green Lane.
|
| 20) |
|
| S Cullen |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 16:03
Clearly this is a terrible idea so close to residential housing. Why is it the local authority refused planning for an eco-housing development on the same site a few years ago due to traffic concerns but apparently thinks an 'eco' incinerator on the same site might be a good idea??
|
| 19) |
|
| Colin Long |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank, Monton |
|
 Thursday, 31. December 2009 15:53
It's a disgrace. This must not happen. They do not seem to have really considered other options, or at least nothing they want to share with us. It's all about the money.
|
| 18) |
|
| Vicky Evans |
|
Street Name, Town: Waterslea, Eccles |
|
Discussed and totally object to the 'eco park'
|
| 17) |
|
| Kelly Connolly |
|
Street Name, Town: Scott Avenue, Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 30. December 2009 11:17
Why have this plant 100m away from our houses? The plant is upwind of Monton and so any fumes will directly affect us and areas surrounding. Other plants that have been built are further than a mile away from any residents!
|
| 16) |
|
| Paul Connolly |
|
Street Name, Town: Scott Avenue, Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 30. December 2009 11:14
Putting an incineration (or gasification as they like to call it) plant within 50-100 m of a residential area is madness. We dont want toxic fumes from both the plant and added traffic (80 HGVs per day!) on our doorstep. This will SIGNIFICANTLY reduce the value of any property in the surrounding area.
|
| 15) |
|
| Phil Williams |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank, Monton |
|
NO NO NO is the only answer to the proposed waste site for Canal Bank this plant is to have a large 55mt high stack spreading it's discharge including toxins throughout the Monton/Eccles area creating a potential health risk to the entire area.
With an extra 80 heavy lorries every 24/7 on an already very busy road is just not acceptable, what is this council thinking, obviously not the residents or the electorate.
|
| 14) |
|
| Stu Newlove |
|
Street Name, Town: M30 - Eccles |
|
 Tuesday, 22. December 2009 23:41
- So the proposed housing scheme is out and the 'Waste' is in? Perhaps it has nothing to do with a crash in the housing market and the increased costs associated with removing Asbestos contamination from the site?
Whatever happened to the original businesses and management who shut the sites? Hands washed, Bonuses and Luxury German Cars?
My point is, can a sustainable & stable/commercial residential area, be subject to mass industrialisation simply because a Motorway passes by (overhead)?
Maybe the 'Town Planners' reconsider the congestion in the area, i.e. Trafford Centre short cuts and put some cash into providing a non-political infrastructure in place for local people [sic], making the roads more bearable for local residents.
What ever the case Monton, Winton and Eccles are far too congested because of short cuts and transport infrastructure. Therefore, my name is behind this petition until a review is conducted by the relevant parties.
Stu Newlove
|
| 13) |
|
| Alison Thompson |
|
Street Name, Town: Eccles |
|

As a resident of Eccles for over 25 years I whole heartilly want to object to this proposed dump .
|
| 12) |
|
| Lisa |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank |
|
 Saturday, 19. December 2009 20:06
Disgusting idea when so close to both a residential area and childrens playround. As a mother of young child and a 2nd on the way I am not willing to live so close to this proposed eco park. Good Luck to Salford Council with the volume of letters they are going to get over the next couple of months regarding this issue as I don't know of a single local resident who is happy with the proposal.
|
| 11) |
|
| Melissa El-Qasem |
|
Street Name, Town: Sunningdale Avenue, Sale |
|
 Saturday, 19. December 2009 13:30
How is this legal?! Every living being is entitled to breath clean air!
|
| 10) |
|
| Anne Moloney |
|
Street Name, Town: Algernon Street |
|
 Thursday, 17. December 2009 20:51
I think that this proposed site would have a negative impact on the local area. The traffic will become even worse that it already is and the value of our properties will fall,in addition to the environmental impact.
|
| 9) |
|
| Cherry |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank, Monton |
|
This is disgraceful. The site is located in a built up residential area, close to schools and on a road that already suffers way too much cut through traffic than it can cope with. Perhaps the council should condider locating this dump on Worsley Green, or maybe Barton Moss - oh no I forgot, they sold this off for millions and have already cashed in at our expense. Not satisifed with that they want to compromise our health with toxic fumes, endanger our children and bring the house prices down in the area. I hope they are ready for the compensation claims that will hit them if this goes through.
|
| 8) |
|
| jean blythe |
|
Street Name, Town: Algernon St Monton Eccles |
|
We don't want it, we don't need it, and we won't have it.
There was an attempt to build a toxic waste plant in Trafford Park some years ago.
There are many food manufacturers in the area, and several threatened to move out, if a waste plant was built there.
I missed the meeting at the Monton House Hotel, so I don't have enough info. The chances are that the company did not admit to disposing of heavy metals and contaminated waste. Once it is built they can probably do whatever they wish. Chances are they have already sorted out a licence.
I will read the report in the Advertiser with great interest and concern
|
| 7) |
|
| stephen james blythe |
|
Street Name, Town: kaisei machi japan |
|
Monton is a village of natural beauty, a place a plan for my students to stay and travel around england from as the owner of an english school in japan, this kind of thing would put me off returning there and staying in the hotels there.
|
| 6) |
|
| paul ridge |
|
Street Name, Town: scott avenue |
|
we dont need this eco park in our village.traffic will be terrible smell even worse.what they forgot to mention was this fantastic chimney they will have 55 metres tall is to let off minimal exhaust pollution over our houses,its also a dump valve when the plant incures problems ,will release any toxic waste fumes that have buit up.WE DONT WANT IT.NO DEBATE.
|
| 5) |
|
| joanne |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Wednesday, 16. December 2009 20:25
We don't want a rubish tip, think of our kids, the smell; traffic, its bad enough as it is. We live in a village by the side of a canal with ducks and swans how will it effect them?
WE SAY NO NO NO.
|
| 4) |
|
| K McGarva |
|
Street Name, Town: Monton |
|
 Wednesday, 16. December 2009 18:56
Toxic fumes 24 hours a day ! this must be stopped !
|
| 3) |
|
| J Halliwell |
|
Street Name, Town: Shackleton Street |
|
 Wednesday, 16. December 2009 17:32
This does not belong here, on the dorsteps of our homes, where small children play, Monton is allready over run with traffic, and green lane has had its fair share of road traffic accidents, we dont want any more...
SAY NO, SAY NO, SAY NO
|
| 2) |
|
| Julie |
|
Street Name, Town: - |
|
 Tuesday, 15. December 2009 22:27
How can this company consider placing this type of industry so close to a residential area and childrens playground.
|
| 1) |
|
| Hani El-Qasem |
|
Street Name, Town: Canal Bank, Eccles |
|
 Monday, 14. December 2009 00:39
I live within 100 metres of the proposed plant. I have a 7 year old daughter and another child to be born mid-next year. Take this somewhere else.
|